Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use https://ibm-ceph.atlassian.net/ for all bug tracking management.

Bug 1997838

Summary: MONs lost quorum
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Justin Bautista <jbautist>
Component: RADOSAssignee: Neha Ojha <nojha>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Pawan <pdhiran>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact: Aron Gunn <agunn>
Priority: urgent    
Version: 4.2CC: agunn, akupczyk, bhubbard, ceph-eng-bugs, ceph-qe-bugs, gsitlani, jbiao, jdurgin, nojha, owasserm, pdhiran, rzarzyns, sbaldwin, sseshasa, tserlin, vereddy, vumrao
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.2z3   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-14.2.11-194.el8cp, ceph-14.2.11-194.el7cp Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Progress module causing Ceph Monitor crashes During backfill and recovery operations, the progress module can generate negative progress events. With large storage clusters, too many negative progress events can lead to large memory allocation on the Ceph Monitor nodes, causing cascading Ceph Monitor crashes. With this release, the code ensures that progress events are not negative. As a result, the progress module does not cause the Ceph Monitors to crash.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-09-27 18:26:56 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1890121    

Comment 23 errata-xmlrpc 2021-09-27 18:26:56 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 4.2 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:3670