Bug 1998007 - [RFE] Haproxy support in Cephadm for RGW
Summary: [RFE] Haproxy support in Cephadm for RGW
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: Cephadm
Version: 5.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 5.1z1
Assignee: Adam King
QA Contact: Manasa
Mary Frances Hull
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2085458
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-08-26 09:09 UTC by Sebastian Wagner
Modified: 2022-05-18 10:38 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-16.2.6-1.el8cp
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.Users can now add high availability to the Ceph Object Gateway service With this release, you can add high availability to the Ceph Object Gateway service. You can deploy Ceph Object Gateway service in the backend using haproxy and keepalived images with the ingress service to back the Ceph Object Gateway service either separately or combined using service specification: .Example ---- service_type: rgw service_id: foo placement: count: 4 host_pattern: "*" spec: rgw_frontend_port: 8000 --- service_type: ingress service_id: rgw.foo placement: count: 2 spec: backend_service: rgw.foo frontend_port: 9000 monitor_port: 9001 virtual_ip: "{{VIP0}}/{{VIPPREFIXLEN}}" ----
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-18 10:38:15 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-951 0 None None None 2021-11-10 06:01:07 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2022:4622 0 None None None 2022-05-18 10:38:36 UTC

Description Sebastian Wagner 2021-08-26 09:09:00 UTC 
BZ duplcate of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHCEPH-348 . Would be great to also make it possible to have BZs that match Epic issues in Jira
Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2021-08-26 09:09:07 UTC 
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.
Comment 21 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-18 10:38:15 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.1 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:4622
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.