Created attachment 1819745 [details] Journal from initial boot after install Description of problem: gsd-usb-protect dumps core on first boot, leading to a sad face before gnome-initial-setup appears (also appears to prolong the time it takes for gnome-initial-setup to appear). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 40.0.1-2.fc35.x86_64 from Fedora 35 20210831.n.1 compose[0]. How reproducible: Only tested a single install, cannot say. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install F35 Workstation Live 2. Reboot after install completes 3. Wait for gnome-initial-setup to appear, notice sad face appearing Actual results: Sad face appears before gnome-initial-setup. "Process 1123 (gsd-usb-protect) of user 983 dumped core." appears in the journal. Expected results: No sad face, gnome-initial-setup launching quickly. Additional info: Journal from initial boot is attached. [0] - https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-35-20210831.n.1/compose/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-35-20210831.n.1.iso
I can confirm this has happened on at least 2 installs in a row. System is x86_64, BIOS.
Proposed as a Blocker for 35-beta by Fedora user nielsenb using the blocker tracking app because: Violates the "SELinux and crash notifications" final release criterion due to generation of a crash report and a sad face on boot.
I meant to propose this as a 35-final blocker as it violates the "SELinux and crash notifications"[0][1]. Also, I have not had time to dig into this. I have only tested on a single system. [0] - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Final_Release_Criteria#SELinux_and_crash_notifications [1] - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TJBDNLJ2WK5SMDAYY7245YNRB2JIWJPZ/
So, the delay on boot is not actually caused by this crash, we don't think. That is tracked at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997310 . I don't know if it's clear what causes the sadface, but it *could* be this. This crash has been around for some time, there is an F35 report at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950669 and an F34 report at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937073 ...
Discussed at 2021-09-06 blocker/FE review meeting: https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2021/fedora-blocker-review.2021-09-06-16.00.html . We agreed to punt on this as the bug is based on what seems to be a false premise - that the gsd-usb-protection crash causes the delay to g-i-s startup. We don't know for sure whether the gsd-usb-protect crash causes the sadface. We agreed to delay any decisions on blocker status till the SELinux issues are cleared up so we can see how things look without those. I'm gonna close this as a dupe of the gsb-usb-protect crash, since we already have bug reports for both the actual issues here (gsd-usb-protect crash and g-i-s slowness). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1950669 ***