Bug 2000563 - gnome-control-center - undefined symbol error
Summary: gnome-control-center - undefined symbol error
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gstreamer1
Version: 35
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Brian Pepple
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F35BetaBlocker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-09-02 12:04 UTC by Stephen Gallagher
Modified: 2021-09-02 15:25 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-09-02 15:23:59 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Stephen Gallagher 2021-09-02 12:04:46 UTC
Description of problem:
Cannot launch gnome-control-center due to undefined symbol error.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

gnome-control-center-41~beta-3.fc35.x86_64
webkit2gtk3-2.33.3-3.fc35.x86_64

How reproducible:
Every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Log into GNOME on Fedora 35 with the latest updates (and testing updates)
2. Open a terminal
3. Run `gnome-control-center`


Actual results:

gnome-control-center: symbol lookup error: /lib64/libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37: undefined symbol: gst_element_request_pad_simple


Expected results:
I should be able to access GNOME settings.

Additional info:
The system journal appears to show this same error for numerous other GNOME components including gnome-online-accounts and gnome-calendar.

Comment 1 Fedora Blocker Bugs Application 2021-09-02 12:06:53 UTC
Proposed as a Blocker for 35-beta by Fedora user sgallagh using the blocker tracking app because:

 "No part of any release-blocking desktop's panel (or equivalent) configuration may crash on startup or be entirely non-functional."

Comment 2 Stephen Gallagher 2021-09-02 12:07:37 UTC
I'm not sure if it's relevant, but I upgraded this system from Fedora 34 using `dnf offline-upgrade`.

Comment 3 Michael Catanzaro 2021-09-02 14:49:24 UTC
(In reply to Stephen Gallagher from comment #0)
> gnome-control-center: symbol lookup error: /lib64/libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37:
> undefined symbol: gst_element_request_pad_simple

This symbol is new in GStreamer 1.20. It seems WebKitGTK was built against a newer version of GStreamer than is actually being used at runtime. That's bad.

Please run:

$ rpm -qi gstreamer1 | grep -C1 Version
$ rpm -qi webkit2gtk3 | grep -C1 Version

Looking at the buildroot for webkit2gtk3-2.33.3-3.fc35 in https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/webkit2gtk3/2.33.3/3.fc35/data/logs/x86_64/root.log, I see:

DEBUG util.py:446:   gstreamer1-devel               x86_64  1.19.1-2.fc35              build  507 k

Are you running against a version of GStreamer that is older than this?

Comment 4 Stephen Gallagher 2021-09-02 15:06:00 UTC
Name        : gstreamer1
Version     : 1.19.1
Release     : 2.1.18.4.fc34

Name        : webkit2gtk3
Version     : 2.33.3
Release     : 3.fc35


It appears that gstreamer wasn't updated when I did the upgrade (because it has a higher ENVR, I think).

Comment 5 Stephen Gallagher 2021-09-02 15:07:26 UTC
And, indeed if I "downgrade" gstreamer1, I have access to the settings without the error.

So we probably need to figure out why that's not being done on upgrade, since I thought `dnf offline-upgrade` was supposed to do a distro-sync.

Comment 6 Michael Catanzaro 2021-09-02 15:23:59 UTC
Well it didn't get upgraded because 1.19.1-2.1.18.4.fc34 is obviously greater than 1.19.1-2.fc35, and you did a normal upgrade instead of a distro-sync. Once upon a time, we would have said "the upgrade path is broken" and treated this as a bug, but nowadays you're expected to use 'dnf system-upgrade' if you want to upgrade via dnf. So I'm going to close this as NOTABUG.

(In reply to Stephen Gallagher from comment #5)
> So we probably need to figure out why that's not being done on upgrade,
> since I thought `dnf offline-upgrade` was supposed to do a distro-sync.

Nope, 'dnf offline-upgrade' is for normal updates. Hopefully a distro-sync will get you back to a consistent state.

Comment 7 Michael Catanzaro 2021-09-02 15:25:41 UTC
BTW the problem is 1.19.1-2.1.18.4.fc34 is *really* 1.18.4. It somehow got upgraded in F34 by mistake, then we downgraded it again and just hoped nothing had started depending on 1.19.1 yet. That actually worked fine for F34, you just don't want the package installed on your F35 box.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.