Bug 2002716 - Review Request: golang-github-git-billy-5 - The missing interface filesystem abstraction for Go
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-git-billy-5 - The missing interface filesystem ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mark E. Fuller
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: golang-github-git-billy-5 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 2002732 2003392 golang-github-git-5
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-09-09 15:01 UTC by Mikel Olasagasti Uranga
Modified: 2022-07-08 07:57 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
If this bug requires documentation, please select an appropriate Doc Type value.
Last Closed: 2022-07-08 07:57:26 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
mark.e.fuller: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2021-09-09 15:01:55 UTC
Spec URL: https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/trivy/golang-github-git-billy-5.spec
SRPM URL: https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/trivy/golang-github-git-billy-5-5.3.1-1.fc34.src.rpm
Description: The missing interface filesystem abstraction for Go
Fedora Account System Username: mikelo2

Comment 1 Mark E. Fuller 2022-06-29 19:55:13 UTC
Standard templated go package - review passes

approved



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
     upstream sources. Licenses found: "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0",
     "Unknown or generated". 38 files have unknown license. Detailed output
     of licensecheck in /home/fuller/fedora-review/2002716-golang-github-
     git-billy-5/licensecheck.txt
[-]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
...
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:


Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:


Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/go-git/go-billy/archive/v5.3.1/go-billy-5.3.1.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 7d715d7cf11f731dc0466bf93903ba7fe6ac70d086bb862fc24e718d9ddc209e
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7d715d7cf11f731dc0466bf93903ba7fe6ac70d086bb862fc24e718d9ddc209e


Requires
--------
golang-github-git-billy-5-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    go-filesystem
    golang(golang.org/x/sys/unix)
    golang(gopkg.in/check.v1)



Provides
--------
golang-github-git-billy-5-devel:
    golang(github.com/go-git/go-billy/v5)
    golang(github.com/go-git/go-billy/v5/helper/chroot)
    golang(github.com/go-git/go-billy/v5/helper/mount)
    golang(github.com/go-git/go-billy/v5/helper/polyfill)
    golang(github.com/go-git/go-billy/v5/helper/temporal)
    golang(github.com/go-git/go-billy/v5/memfs)
    golang(github.com/go-git/go-billy/v5/osfs)
    golang(github.com/go-git/go-billy/v5/test)
    golang(github.com/go-git/go-billy/v5/util)
    golang-github-git-billy-5-devel
    golang-ipath(github.com/go-git/go-billy/v5)

Comment 2 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2022-07-03 13:58:58 UTC
@mikel Could you pretty please build it on F35 through F37?

Comment 3 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2022-07-03 14:19:08 UTC
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #2)
> @mikel Could you pretty please build it on F35 through F37?

With:

# Generated by go2rpm 1.6.0
%bcond_without check
%global debug_package %{nil}


and auto br:

%prep
%goprep

%generate_buildrequires
%go_generate_buildrequires

Comment 4 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2022-07-03 14:19:24 UTC
*** Bug 2102859 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2022-07-07 20:47:49 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-git-billy-5

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-07-08 07:54:13 UTC
FEDORA-2022-459e5918eb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-459e5918eb

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-07-08 07:57:26 UTC
FEDORA-2022-459e5918eb has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.