RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2003965 - Update to 2.13.0
Summary: Update to 2.13.0
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ignition
Version: CentOS Stream
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: rc
: 9.0
Assignee: Sohan Kunkerkar
QA Contact: Micah Abbott
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2044873
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-09-14 08:46 UTC by Timothée Ravier
Modified: 2022-05-17 13:47 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ignition-2.13.0-1.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 2021609 2021611 2066829 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-17 13:46:40 UTC
Type: Enhancement
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Gitlab redhat/centos-stream/rpms ignition merge_requests 5 0 None None None 2021-09-17 14:12:14 UTC
Gitlab redhat/centos-stream/rpms ignition merge_requests 7 0 None None None 2022-01-21 09:49:19 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-97070 0 None None None 2021-09-14 08:53:55 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2022:2583 0 None None None 2022-05-17 13:46:43 UTC

Description Timothée Ravier 2021-09-14 08:46:10 UTC
Update Ignition to latest release: 2.13.0

Comment 1 Sohan Kunkerkar 2021-09-16 13:55:13 UTC
(In reply to Timothée Ravier from comment #0)
> Update Ignition to latest release and specfile with C9S fixes.
> 
> See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ignition/pull-request/85.

This PR has been merged.

Comment 2 Sohan Kunkerkar 2021-09-17 14:31:01 UTC
We need someone from RHEL PM to add a `release+` flag to proceed with this change.

Comment 5 Sohan Kunkerkar 2021-09-20 15:35:02 UTC
(In reply to RHEL Program Management from comment #3)
> A request has been made to complete this BZ as an exception (that is, after
> the deadline).  To facilitate review, the Product Owner (or a delegate) must
> provide an impact statement.  This is done by clicking the [reply] link on
> this comment, and then replying in-line to this message. 
>  This must be done to facilitate review, even if the case appears to be
> obvious, or is already covered elsewhere in the BZ. The exception will not
> be reviewed until this is done.
> 
> ======= Impact Statement ======= 
> 
> What is the benefit of making this change after the deadline? What is the
> impact on customer satisfaction, and on the business?

This is critical to the effort of RHCOS/OCP to be able to consume RHEL 9 content. Although it should not affect the RHEL 9 customers, it would impact the ability of OCP/RHCOS to directly consume that change.

> What is the risk to the release schedule, quality, and the impact of
> diverting resources from other efforts? Will there be enough time to do the
> necessary large-scale, cross-function, regression, stress, or
> fault-insertion testing that may be required to verify this change? 

We don't anticipate any impact on the release schedule. The testing has already been performed on CoreOS variants of RHEL to verify this change.

Comment 6 Colin Walters 2021-09-23 16:43:00 UTC
Hmm.  I think we can also land this in 9.1 or whatever too though, and until then just use some other place.

But, clearly the flip side is it's just a new package that...well it seems *extremely* unlikely it could somehow break something that isn't CoreOS.

Comment 15 Micah Abbott 2022-02-23 18:41:14 UTC
Did a simple install of `ignition` on a RHEL 9 VM and it worked correctly.  Confirmed that it was 2.13.0

Since it was never released as part of RHEL 8 (only for OCP), upgrade testing is not applicable.

Moving this to VERIFIED

Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-17 13:46:40 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (new packages: ignition), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:2583


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.