Bug 200502 (CVE-2006-3746) - CVE-2006-3746 GnuPG Parse_Comment Remote Buffer Overflow
Summary: CVE-2006-3746 GnuPG Parse_Comment Remote Buffer Overflow
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: CVE-2006-3746
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nalin Dahyabhai
QA Contact: Mike McLean
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-07-28 08:17 UTC by Marcel Holtmann
Modified: 2019-09-29 12:19 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHSA-2006-0615
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-08-02 09:33:10 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2006:0615 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: gnupg security update 2006-08-02 04:00:00 UTC

Description Marcel Holtmann 2006-07-28 08:17:01 UTC
Text from Security Focus:

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19110/

GnuPG is prone to a remote buffer-overflow vulnerability because it fails to
properly bounds-check user-supplied input before copying it to an insufficiently
sized memory buffer.

This issue may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary machine code in the
context of the affected application, but this has not been confirmed.

GnuPG version 1.4.4 is vulnerable to this issue; previous versions may also be
affected.

The following Perl command demonstrates this issue by crashing the affected
application:

perl -e 'print "\xfd\xff\xff\xff\xff\xfe"'| /var/gnupg/bin/gpg --no-armor

http://lists.immunitysec.com/pipermail/dailydave/2006-July/003354.html

Comment 7 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-08-02 09:33:11 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0615.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.