Bug 2006025 - Description to use an existing StorageClass while creating StorageSystem needs to be re-phrased [NEEDINFO]
Summary: Description to use an existing StorageClass while creating StorageSystem need...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Console Storage Plugin
Version: 4.9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.10.0
Assignee: Vineet
QA Contact: Oded
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-09-20 17:38 UTC by Aman Agrawal
Modified: 2022-03-10 16:12 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-03-10 16:12:09 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
amagrawa: needinfo? (nberry)
amagrawa: needinfo? (ygalanti)


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Description from UI (115.88 KB, image/png)
2021-09-20 17:38 UTC, Aman Agrawal
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github openshift console pull 10263 0 None open Bug 2006025: Rephrases description to use an existing StorageClass 2021-10-19 09:47:29 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2022:0056 0 None None None 2022-03-10 16:12:37 UTC

Description Aman Agrawal 2021-09-20 17:38:02 UTC
Created attachment 1824732 [details]
Description from UI

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): OCP 4.9.0-0.nightly-2021-09-18-052905 and ODF 4.9.0-142.ci


How reproducible: Everytime


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install odf-operator
2. Create storagesystem, check the description to use an existing StorageClass on Backing storage page.

Actual results: Description to use an existing StorageClass while creating StorageSystem needs to be re-phrased.

Please refer to the attached screenshot.


Expected results: This is not only meant to use an existing infrastructure StorageClass so needs re-phrasing. 

@ygalanti might know it better.


Additional info:

Comment 2 Yuval 2021-09-29 07:43:54 UTC
hey, can we just remove the word "infrastructure"? and that will mean all pre-created storage classes

Comment 4 Vineet 2021-10-19 07:17:33 UTC
Sure afeen

Comment 11 Oded 2021-12-21 15:04:11 UTC
Hi @amagrawa ,

Can I move this bz based on screenshot?

Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2022-03-10 16:12:09 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.3 security update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:0056


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.