Bug 2006025 - Description to use an existing StorageClass while creating StorageSystem needs to be re-phrased
Summary: Description to use an existing StorageClass while creating StorageSystem need...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Console Storage Plugin
Version: 4.9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.10.0
Assignee: Vineet
QA Contact: Oded
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-09-20 17:38 UTC by Aman Agrawal
Modified: 2023-09-15 01:15 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-03-10 16:12:09 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Description from UI (115.88 KB, image/png)
2021-09-20 17:38 UTC, Aman Agrawal 		no flags Details
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github openshift console pull 10263 0 None open Bug 2006025: Rephrases description to use an existing StorageClass 2021-10-19 09:47:29 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2022:0056 0 None None None 2022-03-10 16:12:37 UTC

Description Aman Agrawal 2021-09-20 17:38:02 UTC 
Created attachment 1824732 [details]
Description from UI

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): OCP 4.9.0-0.nightly-2021-09-18-052905 and ODF 4.9.0-142.ci


How reproducible: Everytime


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install odf-operator
2. Create storagesystem, check the description to use an existing StorageClass on Backing storage page.

Actual results: Description to use an existing StorageClass while creating StorageSystem needs to be re-phrased.

Please refer to the attached screenshot.


Expected results: This is not only meant to use an existing infrastructure StorageClass so needs re-phrasing. 

@ygalanti might know it better.


Additional info:
Comment 2 Yuval 2021-09-29 07:43:54 UTC 
hey, can we just remove the word "infrastructure"? and that will mean all pre-created storage classes
Comment 4 Vineet 2021-10-19 07:17:33 UTC 
Sure afeen
Comment 11 Oded 2021-12-21 15:04:11 UTC 
Hi @amagrawa ,

Can I move this bz based on screenshot?
Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2022-03-10 16:12:09 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.3 security update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:0056
Comment 17 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-15 01:15:16 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 500 days
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.