Bug 2006083 - [Workload-DFG] [RFE] cephadm should create/configure RGW pools
Summary: [Workload-DFG] [RFE] cephadm should create/configure RGW pools
Keywords:
Status: VERIFIED
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: Cephadm
Version: 5.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 8.1
Assignee: Adam King
QA Contact: Madhavi Kasturi
Karen Norteman
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-09-20 20:18 UTC by Vikhyat Umrao
Modified: 2025-04-21 08:06 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-19.2.1-100.el9cp
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
triaged 8.0 triaged 8.1
Last Closed:
Embargoed:
mkasturi: needinfo+

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 52674 0 None None None 2021-09-20 20:18:18 UTC
Red Hat Bugzilla 2006084 1 unspecified CLOSED [Workload-DFG] RGW pool creation code cleanup with pg autoscaler for mostly_omap use case 2023-09-15 01:36:10 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-1823 0 None None None 2021-09-20 20:21:48 UTC

Description Vikhyat Umrao 2021-09-20 20:18:19 UTC 
Description of problem:
Ceph orch/cephadm should create/configure RGW pools
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/52674

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHCS 5
Comment 1 Vikhyat Umrao 2021-09-20 20:22:10 UTC 
Please check the RGW cleanup bug - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006084 as the current RGW code https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/52673 mentioned here is causing issue to wrongly configure RGW metadata pools in RHCS 5 release.
Comment 2 Sebastian Wagner 2021-09-23 15:15:24 UTC 
Just to clarify, there is a workaround to create the RGW pools before deploying RGW, right? If yes, this is not going to be a high priority issue.
Comment 3 Vikhyat Umrao 2021-09-27 21:49:33 UTC 
(In reply to Sebastian Wagner from comment #2)
> Just to clarify, there is a workaround to create the RGW pools before
> deploying RGW, right? If yes, this is not going to be a high priority issue.

Thanks, Sebastian. I have changed the severity. The main issue is at the RGW code where it is configuring the RGW meta pool with the wrong pg count and bias ratio. When bug 2006084 is fixed it would be good to have the logic implemented in cephadm!
Comment 4 Sebastian Wagner 2021-10-12 10:48:36 UTC 
Moving this to 5.2, as we have a good workaround for this.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.