Bug 2010608
| Summary: | rpm2flatpak doesn't use custom build of a dependency | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora Modules | Reporter: | Milan Crha <mcrha> |
| Component: | flatpak-runtime | Assignee: | Kalev Lember <klember> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | unspecified | CC: | klember, mark, otaylor |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-10-13 20:43:56 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2010597 | ||
|
Description
Milan Crha
2021-10-05 07:59:16 UTC
Hm, if I look at the build logs, it looks like the flatpak container build has indeed picked up the evolution-data-server build from flatpak-common. I guess it's because the evolution-data-server build from flatpak-common happened to have a higher release number: evolution-data-server-3.40.4-1.module_f34+12673+4f71ea37 (flatpak-common) evolution-data-server-3.40.4-1.module_f34+12632+5ae7e8f8 (evolution) A quick fix should be to just drop evolution-data-server from flatpak-common to work this around for now. I'm in the process of rebuilding all flatpaks to be based on F35 flatpak runtime and I can take care of this while doing the rebuilds. https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/flatpak-common/c/0dda9f95c335dd390f3af4b78179b176461a5d68?branch=f35 I'll update the ticket once the evolution build is done. > A quick fix should be to just drop evolution-data-server from flatpak-common to work this around for now.
Won't that break the other apps, which expect it being available? I think of the GNOME Calendar and such, but I do not know how they build here.
Yeah, we'll have to add it to the manifest for all the other apps that need it -- I'll take care of it. FEDORA-FLATPAK-2021-c6503004da has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35 Flatpaks. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2021-c6503004da FEDORA-FLATPAK-2021-c6503004da has been pushed to the Fedora 35 Flatpaks testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2021-c6503004da See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-FLATPAK-2021-c6503004da has been pushed to the Fedora 35 Flatpaks stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |