Created attachment 1829622 [details] screenshot Description of problem: I installed a partner operator in a 4.8.12 cluster. Looking at the installed operator status page here: https://console-openshift-console.apps.demo.ocp.home/k8s/ns/openshift-operators/operators.coreos.com~v1alpha1~ClusterServiceVersion/blackduck-connector-operator.v1.0.0/ ... the "Conditions" at the bottom are confusing, and I don't think it's just this particular operator that's the issue. Screenshot attached. The ClusterServiceVersion conditions do not have a field called "Status". So when the console shows that every listed condition has a "Status" of "True", that is confusing, and I'm not sure where it's getting or deriving that information. It's also easy to interpret this table as saying the operator is in all of these conditions at the same time. Based on some quick slack feedback, it seems there might be an expectation that only the most recent condition represents current state. And the entries are expected to be chronological, so the last one is most recent. It would help to figure out what OLM's intent is here and better represent which entries are historical vs. which represent current state. This may be related to the CSV taking a different approach to conditions than what's in the k8s API conventions doc: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/sig-architecture/api-conventions.md#typical-status-properties The table shown in the UI would probably work fine for conditions created with that approach. But since OLM is taking a different approach with CSVs, it would help a lot to coordinate and provide some sort of hints or visual guidance about what's the current state vs. not. And getting rid of the "Status" column almost certainly makes sense. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.8.12 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. install an optional operator (I used Black Duck in this case) 2. Look at its conditions in the console Actual results: screenshot attached Expected results: Something that makes it clear what the current status is vs what's historical. Also not having the extra "Status" column that isn't in the source data. Additional info: Here is the YAML representation of what's in the screenshot: conditions: - lastTransitionTime: '2021-10-05T16:54:58Z' lastUpdateTime: '2021-10-05T16:54:58Z' message: requirements not yet checked phase: Pending reason: RequirementsUnknown - lastTransitionTime: '2021-10-05T16:54:58Z' lastUpdateTime: '2021-10-05T16:54:58Z' message: 'all requirements found, attempting install' phase: InstallReady reason: AllRequirementsMet - lastTransitionTime: '2021-10-05T16:54:58Z' lastUpdateTime: '2021-10-05T16:54:58Z' message: waiting for install components to report healthy phase: Installing reason: InstallSucceeded - lastTransitionTime: '2021-10-05T16:54:58Z' lastUpdateTime: '2021-10-05T16:54:58Z' message: >- installing: waiting for deployment blackduck-connector-operator-controller-manager to become ready: deployment "blackduck-connector-operator-controller-manager" not available: Deployment does not have minimum availability. phase: Installing reason: InstallWaiting - lastTransitionTime: '2021-10-05T16:55:17Z' lastUpdateTime: '2021-10-05T16:55:17Z' message: install strategy completed with no errors phase: Succeeded reason: InstallSucceeded
Hey Michael, thanks for reporting issue. Today the installed operator status page is showing the conditions by design, meaning that we are not doing any assumptions and just render the conditions in the given order. What you are proposing seems valid but it would require also design work. For that reason I would suggest rather to create a RFE in Console's JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/projects/CONSOLE/issue Sam is this something we would wanna threat as BZ for backport purposes?
I think it's reasonable to align the table with the API on the CSV page as a bug fix (i.e. remove columns like `Status` that aren't in the YAML). Larger changes like differentiating between current and historical conditions require design input and probably should be a story.
@Joe I would check the API for the CSV, InstallPlan and Subscription condition types and based on the type I would render appropriate table.
@xiyuzhao it looks like this bugzilla must be manually set to verified. could you look into this when you get a chance? Thanks!
This bug has been verified and fixed on payload 4.10.0-0.nightly-2021-11-15-034648 Verification Steps: 1. Log in OCP, and install an optional operator (Here I used PackageServer, and installed 'Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes' for testing) 2. Navigate to the Operator Details page 3. Verify if the column of Conditions is clearer than before and also does not have the extra "Status" column that isn't in the source data. Result: 3. The columns 'Phase' is instead of the old two which include 'Type, Status' to make the condition much clearer than before. Now the Conditions table is updated to handle the types: clusterserviceversion, installplan, and subscription conditions as called out in the request
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.3 security update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:0056