Bug 2016014
| Summary: | rebase RHEL 8.6 with 389-ds-base-1.4.3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | mreynolds |
| Component: | 389-ds-base | Assignee: | mreynolds |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | RHDS QE <ds-qe-bugs> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfe> |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 8.6 | CC: | aadhikar, gkimetto, ldap-maint, sgouvern |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Rebase, Triaged |
| Target Release: | 8.6 | Flags: | pm-rhel:
mirror+
|
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 389-ds-1.4-8060020211118202403.ce3e8c9c | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
| Doc Text: |
.Directory Server rebased to version 1.4.3.28
The `389-ds-base` packages have been upgraded to upstream version 1.4.3, which provides a number of bug fixes and enhancements over the previous version:
* A potential deadlock in replicas has been fixed.
* The server no longer terminates unexpectedly when the `dnaInterval` is set to `0`.
* The performance of connection handling has been improved.
* Improved performance of `targetfilter` in access control instructions (ACI).
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-05-10 13:43:24 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
mreynolds
2021-10-20 15:43:28 UTC
rpm -qa | grep 389-ds-base 389-ds-base-snmp-1.4.3.28-1.module+el8.6.0+13040+7da9aab8.x86_64 In the logs : 389-ds-base-1.4.3.28 Marking as VERIFIED Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (389-ds:1.4 bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:1815 |