Spec URL: https://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-opensearch-py/python-opensearch-py-1.0.0-1.fc34.src.rpm SRPM URL: https://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-opensearch-py/python-opensearch-py.spec Description: opensearch-py is a community-driven, open source OpenSearch client licensed under the Apache v2.0 License. For more information, see opensearch.org. Fedora Account System Username: stevetraylen
1) spec file is missing BuildRequires: python3-setuptools 2) changelog is not compliant to Fedora guidelines https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#changelogs
> 1) spec file is missing BuildRequires: python3-setuptools Indeed, that changed between review and now. >2) changelog is not compliant to Fedora guidelines https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#changelogs :-) Spec URL: https://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-opensearch-py/python-opensearch-py-1.0.0-2.fc34.src.rpm SRPM URL: https://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-opensearch-py/python-opensearch-py.spec
(In reply to Steve Traylen from comment #2) > > 1) spec file is missing BuildRequires: python3-setuptools > > Indeed, that changed between review and now. > > >2) changelog is not compliant to Fedora guidelines https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#changelogs > > :-) > > Spec URL: > https://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-opensearch-py/python-opensearch-py-1.0. > 0-2.fc34.src.rpm > SRPM URL: > https://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-opensearch-py/python-opensearch-py.spec Hello, the two files are not reachable
Sorry 34 became 35. Spec URL: https://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-opensearch-py/python-opensearch-py-1.0.0-2.fc35.src.rpm SRPM URL: https://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-opensearch-py/python-opensearch-py.spec
Created attachment 1849027 [details] errors in fedora-review I am currently trying to figure out if the following errors are a bug of fedora-review or not
Hi, I don't really see this as blocked by the fedora-review crash? Steve.
I updated package to new %pymacros Spec URL: https://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-opensearch-py/python-opensearch-py-1.0.0-3.fc36.src.rpm SRPM URL: https://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-opensearch-py/python-opensearch-py.spec
For me fedora-review runs fine against this bug:
Today I am trying to fix the fedora-review problem once for all
PACKAGE APPROVED Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0", "Apache License 2.0". 9 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/user/review/python-opensearch- py/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). Rpmlint ------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Source checksums ---------------- https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/o/opensearch-py/opensearch-py-1.0.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : fa952836cabfa1b2fb05f852edc1a373342494345e89fd52b7124daf4d296bb4 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : fa952836cabfa1b2fb05f852edc1a373342494345e89fd52b7124daf4d296bb4 Requires -------- python3-opensearch-py (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): (python3.10dist(urllib3) < 2~~ with python3.10dist(urllib3) >= 1.21.1) python(abi) python3.10dist(certifi) Provides -------- python3-opensearch-py: python-opensearch-py python3-opensearch-py python3.10-opensearch-py python3.10dist(opensearch-py) python3dist(opensearch-py) Generated by fedora-review 0.7.6 (b083f91) last change: 2020-11-10 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -v -rn python-opensearch-py-1.0.0-3.fc36.src.rpm -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Python, Shell-api Disabled plugins: PHP, R, Ocaml, Perl, SugarActivity, fonts, Java, Haskell, C/C++ Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-opensearch-py
FEDORA-2022-d105fda42e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d105fda42e
FEDORA-2022-d105fda42e has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2022-30b59a2a29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-30b59a2a29
FEDORA-2022-30b59a2a29 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.