Bug 2021815 - Please rebuild with json-c-0.13.1-3
Summary: Please rebuild with json-c-0.13.1-3
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: cryptsetup
Version: 8.6
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.6
Assignee: Ondrej Kozina
QA Contact: guazhang@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2219521 2001063
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-11-10 09:33 UTC by Tomas Korbar
Modified: 2023-07-04 06:41 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: cryptsetup-2.3.7-1.el8
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-10 15:30:31 UTC
Type: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-102354 0 None None None 2021-11-10 16:27:50 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2022:2097 0 None None None 2022-05-10 15:30:40 UTC

Comment 2 guazhang@redhat.com 2021-12-14 00:54:07 UTC 
Could you please share some details about how to test ? if yes, I will test it in RHEL-8.6.0 phase.

thanks
Comment 3 Ondrej Kozina 2022-01-05 14:30:58 UTC 
(In reply to guazhang from comment #2)
> Could you please share some details about how to test ? if yes, I will test
> it in RHEL-8.6.0 phase.

There's nothing special to test really. It's just rebuild with new json-c library, no changes in cryptsetup are needed. Upstream testsuite or ordinary QA regression tests should do the job.
Comment 4 guazhang@redhat.com 2022-01-26 07:28:16 UTC 
Test pass cryptsetup and json-c regression  testing .
Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-10 15:30:31 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (cryptsetup bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:2097
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.