Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RDO tickets are now tracked in Jira https://issues.redhat.com/projects/RDO/issues/

Bug 2021983

Summary: Package review: task-core
Product: [Community] RDO Reporter: Kevin Carter <kecarter>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Alfredo Moralejo <amoralej>
Status: CLOSED COMPLETED QA Contact: hguemar
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: trunkCC: amoralej, jslagle, kkula
Target Milestone: ---Flags: amoralej: rdo-review+
Target Release: trunk   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-02-14 10:12:33 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2033345    

Comment 1 James Slagle 2022-01-04 18:03:18 UTC
RDO patch: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/37720

Comment 2 Alfredo Moralejo 2022-01-18 16:56:33 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0".
     116 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /tmp/borrame4/task-core/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[-]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 6 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     python3-task-core , task-core-examples
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
     Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
     Note: %define requiring justification: %define upstream_version
     0.2.2.dev4
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python3-task-core-0.2.2-0.20220118143732.182827c.el9.noarch.rpm
          task-core-examples-0.2.2-0.20220118143732.182827c.el9.noarch.rpm
          task-core-0.2.2-0.20220118143732.182827c.el9.src.rpm
python3-task-core.noarch: E: no-changelogname-tag
python3-task-core.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/Directord/task-core Remote end closed connection without response
python3-task-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary task-core
task-core-examples.noarch: W: description-shorter-than-summary
task-core-examples.noarch: E: no-changelogname-tag
task-core-examples.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/Directord/task-core The read operation timed out
task-core-examples.noarch: W: file-in-meta-package
task-core-examples.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/task-core/examples/directord/basic/run_basic.sh 644 /bin/bash 
task-core-examples.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/task-core/examples/directord/services/files/mariadb/galera_init.sh.j2 644 /bin/bash 
task-core-examples.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/task-core/examples/directord/services/files/swift/ringbuilder.sh 644 /bin/bash 
task-core-examples.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/task-core/examples/directord/undercloud/run_3ctl.sh 644 /bin/bash 
task-core-examples.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary task-core-example
task-core.src: E: no-changelogname-tag
task-core.src: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/Directord/task-core The read operation timed out
task-core.src: W: invalid-url Source0: task-core-0.2.2.dev4-0.20220118143732.182827c.tar.gz
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 8 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
(none): E: no installed packages by name task-core-examples
(none): E: no installed packages by name python3-task-core
0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.



Requires
--------
python3-task-core (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/bash
    /usr/bin/python3
    python3-jsonschema
    python3-networkx
    python3-stevedore
    python3-taskflow
    python3-yaml

task-core-examples (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/python3
    python3-task-core



Provides
--------
python3-task-core:
    python-task-core
    python3-task-core
    python3.9-task-core

task-core-examples:
    task-core-examples



Generated by fedora-review 0.7.6 (b083f91) last change: 2020-11-10
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m centos-stream-9-cbs -rn task-core-0.2.2-0.20220118143732.182827c.el9.src.rpm
Buildroot used: centos-stream-9-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, Python
Disabled plugins: Java, fonts, PHP, Ocaml, SugarActivity, R, C/C++, Haskell, Perl
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH


Some notes:

- spec is to be used by dlrn so it has no changelog
- there are no unit tests running in %check, it'd be good to get them in as follow-up

Package is APPROVED

Comment 3 kkula 2024-02-14 10:12:33 UTC
The package was added to Yoga.