Bug 2022023 - libarchive: FTBTS with OpenSSL 3.0.0
Summary: libarchive: FTBTS with OpenSSL 3.0.0
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: libarchive
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matej Mužila
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: OpenSSL3.0 F36FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-11-10 15:26 UTC by Sahana Prasad
Modified: 2022-01-19 10:18 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-01-19 10:18:20 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Sahana Prasad 2021-11-10 15:26:02 UTC
This bug is used to track the readiness of libarchive with OpenSSL 3.0.0.

Currently the build fails to build with OpenSSL 3.0.0 with the following logs
Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=78020190

Kindly fix them to ensure this package builds with OpenSSL 3.0.0

You can treat the deprecated warnings not as errors if you want to continue to use deprecated functions, but it is encouraged to use the new APIs, and this migration could be done sooner than later.

To not treat deprecated warnings as errors, you may use
-Wno-error=deprecated-declarations

To port to new APIs, kindly refer to the OpenSSL upstream migration guide:
https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/man7/migration_guide.html

Thank you

Comment 1 Marek Kašík 2021-12-06 12:53:21 UTC
Hi,

this blocks me from updating evince in rawhide.

Comment 2 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2021-12-07 00:12:07 UTC
This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.

Comment 3 Marek Kašík 2021-12-08 09:07:18 UTC
(In reply to Marek Kašík from comment #1)
> Hi,
> 
> this blocks me from updating evince in rawhide.

The evince has been build successfully yesterday. The failing build did not have openssl1.1 among installed packages where the successful one had it. I don't know why, maybe some "comps" magic.

Comment 4 Matej Mužila 2022-01-19 10:18:20 UTC
This was fixed by https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-3352d91e02


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.