Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 2024878

Summary: [DDF][8.7] With xfs being the default filesystem on RHEL 8, shouldn't an xfs example be provided instead of ext4?
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Direct Docs Feedback <ddf-bot>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: Steven J. Levine <slevine>
Documentation sub component: DDF QA Contact:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE Docs Contact:
Severity: medium    
Priority: high CC: rhel-docs, swachira
Version: 8.5Keywords: Documentation
Target Milestone: rcFlags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Target Release: 8.8   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-03-06 18:10:45 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Comment 2 Steven J. Levine 2022-02-28 14:19:46 UTC
Discussion of this issue as taken place elsewhere so I am summarizing the status on the BZ (I'm a little late in doing this, the discussion took place several weeks ago).  

I brought this up at the Cluster PM meeting, and as expected there is general agreement that this is a good idea although not of immediate high priority.  Although the change seems simple enough (it's basically a matter of one mkfs command, and subsequent output to reflect that, but no change to the procedure steps), it will involve not just a documentation update but testing each updated procedure (there are a few of them that use the ext4 file system).  This brings in the QE department, which doesn't have the capacity to do this in the 8.6/9.0 time frame (however simple it is). 

We plan to make these updates, but we will start working on them once 8.6 and 9.0 are settled.  Again, this is definitely a good idea and we will work it into our plans.

Comment 3 Sam Wachira 2022-03-01 11:57:32 UTC
Thank you Steven.

Not an urgent one and can be dealt with after 8.6 and 9.0 are settled.

Comment 5 Steven J. Levine 2023-01-04 21:53:28 UTC
Exchange with Abhi Das on 1/4/22:

<slevine> abhi: I have a really basic file system question that has nothing to do with the Clustered Samba procedure, but I think you can help:
<slevine> When we first wrote up all the cluster (and LVM) procedures, we used ext4 file systems. But our default file system has been xfs for a long time now, so I have a ticket to update our examples
<slevine> I think this should be trivially easy – use mkfs.xfs instead of mkfs.ext4
<slevine> As in the final step of this example at the end of section 6.1 in the cluster title: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/8/html-single/configuring_and_managing_high_availability_clusters/index#proc_configuring-lvm-volume-with-ext4-file-system-configuring-ha-nfs
<slevine> So I think all I need to do is run the examples with mkfs.xfs and update the output
<slevine> Is it that simple? I know there are many options, but for the equivalent of what we provide now for ext4 it seems we don't really need them.
<abhi> yes, mkfs.xfs will work as expected

Comment 7 Sam Wachira 2023-03-08 11:41:07 UTC
Thank you Steven. The updated docs look good.