Bug 2025727 - Ohhhh jeeee: Assertion "sig->version >= 4"
Summary: Ohhhh jeeee: Assertion "sig->version >= 4"
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 2022904
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnupg2
Version: 35
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Red Hat Crypto Team
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-11-22 20:26 UTC by Jakub Kadlčík
Modified: 2021-11-24 07:14 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-11-24 07:14:19 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:
fedora-admin-xmlrpc: mirror+


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker FC-337 0 None None None 2021-11-22 20:27:06 UTC

Description Jakub Kadlčík 2021-11-22 20:26:22 UTC
Description of problem:
In Copr, we use obs-signd for signing packages. It uses gpg2 internally. After we upgraded from F33 to F35 it started failing with a strange error.

[root@copr-keygen-dev ~][STG]# /bin/sign -u frostyx#foo.org -k
gpg: problem with fast path key listing: Result truncated - ignored
gpg: Ohhhh jeeee: Assertion "sig->version >= 4" in mk_notation_policy_etc failed (sign.c:89)
Aborted (core dumped)


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

- gnupg2-2.3.3-1.fc35.x86_64
- obs-signd-2.5.10-1.20210907git5c32050.fc35.x86_64


How reproducible:

I am sorry, I don't have a more concrete reproducer using only `gpg2` command. If necessary, I can try to dig in more.


Additional info:

The error message

gpg: Ohhhh jeeee: Assertion "sig->version >= 4" in mk_notation_policy_etc failed 

seems that it was not meant for users. I don't really understand what is wrong and why. Is there some issue on my side or is this a bug in gpg2?

Comment 1 Jakub Kadlčík 2021-11-22 20:29:00 UTC
FTR I submitted this issue for obs-signd as well
https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-sign/issues/32

Comment 2 Pavel Raiskup 2021-11-24 07:14:19 UTC
Seems like a duplicate to bug 2022904 in the end.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2022904 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.