Spec URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/bygfoot/bygfoot.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/bygfoot/bygfoot-2.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: Bygfoot is a small and simple graphical football (a.k.a. soccer) manager game featuring many international leagues and cups.
I'll give this a look over :-)
Good Software works! rpmlint is clean on all packages and subpackages builds cleanly in mock no duplicates in the rpm consistent use of macros in the spec file spec file is in american english upstream version same as this version md5sums match no ownership problems correct use of scripts Docs okay Needs work %files %{_bindir}/* If you change this to %{_bindir}/bygfoot* then I'm happy to FE-APPROVE this
Corrected SPEC file: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/bygfoot/bygfoot.spec
What is pkgconfig in there for?
(In reply to comment #4) > What is pkgconfig in there for? I don't know, but it is needed for fine mock build.
Wierd! I've checked in mock and you're right. APPROVED Don't forget to close the bug and set it as NEXT-RELEASE
(In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > What is pkgconfig in there for? > > I don't know, but it is needed for fine mock build. I'm unable to reproduce an issue with this. I removed the buildreq of pkgconfig and it still got pulled in properly as a dependency of other buildrequired packages when running mock builds on FC5.x86_64 and FC6.i386. Where is the failure happening when you guys tried this?
(In reply to comment #7) > I'm unable to reproduce an issue with this. I removed the buildreq of pkgconfig > and it still got pulled in properly as a dependency of other buildrequired > packages when running mock builds on FC5.x86_64 and FC6.i386. > > Where is the failure happening when you guys tried this? I realized why you're unable to reproduce that issue. I notice that pkgconfig is installed as a dependency for gtk2-devel, gettext or desktop-file-utils. This is mock build report: ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: desktop-file-utils x86_64 0.10-6.1 core 62 k gettext x86_64 0.14.5-3 core 1.4 M gtk2-devel x86_64 2.8.15-1 core 2.7 M Installing for dependencies: atk x86_64 1.11.3-1 core 209 k atk-devel x86_64 1.11.3-1 core 104 k ....... ....... pkgconfig x86_64 1:0.20-2.2.1 core 61 k So probably we can delete pkgconfig BR. I can do it in next release.
I think it may be down to my i386 buildsys, but it gtk2-devel wasn't dragging in pkgconfig. I'll need to check at home in case there is a conflict somewhere.
(In reply to comment #9) > I think it may be down to my i386 buildsys, but it gtk2-devel wasn't dragging in > pkgconfig. > > I'll need to check at home in case there is a conflict somewhere. There's something wrong there because gtk2-devel requires glib2-devel, which in turn requires pkgconfig >= 1:0.8 The pkgconfig in FC5 is 1:0.20, which should be pulled in by this dependency. The same dependency chain is there in rawhide too.
Checked, it seems to be a problem at my end. pkgconfig is not required. You can remove it safely.
Anything happening with this bug?
If this package has been included, could you please close this bug and mark it as NEXTRELEASE?
I was on vacation. Now, I'm closing it.