Bug 2027046 - python-pyedflib missing on s390x
Summary: python-pyedflib missing on s390x
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-pyedflib
Version: 42
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Iztok Fister, Jr.
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: ZedoraTracker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-11-27 12:20 UTC by Iztok Fister Jr.
Modified: 2026-06-08 15:38 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-06-08 15:38:19 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Iztok Fister Jr. 2021-11-27 12:20:54 UTC
Tests fail on s390x due to endianness issues.

Uses a forked copy of EDFlib (https://gitlab.com/Teuniz/EDFlib), which has elected not to support big-endian architectures.

Comment 1 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 21:24:50 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 36 development cycle.
Changing version to 36.

Comment 2 Ben Cotton 2022-08-09 13:12:21 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 37 development cycle.
Changing version to 37.

Comment 3 Ben Cotton 2023-02-07 14:52:36 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 38 development cycle.
Changing version to 38.

Comment 4 Raphael Groner 2024-04-15 17:25:24 UTC
Do you still need a package? Be aware F39 is EOL'ed, currently rawhide for upcoming F41 and F40 beta.

Comment 5 Raphael Groner 2024-04-15 17:41:49 UTC
Upstream writes…

The EDF/EDF+ format saves all data with 16 Bit. The company BioSemi introduced a version which saves all data with 24 Bit.
…
You need a C compiler and a recent version of Cython.

For Cython 3 there's recommended to use clang instead of gcc alternatively because performance. No idea about proper license of BioSemi.

Comment 6 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-10-17 14:05:43 UTC
This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.

Comment 7 Aoife Moloney 2025-02-26 12:51:39 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 42 development cycle.
Changing version to 42.

Comment 8 Fedora Release Engineering 2026-05-06 11:25:33 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 42 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 42 on 2026-05-13.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
'version' of '42'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora Linux version. Note that the version field may be hidden.
Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see it.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 42 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.

Comment 9 Aoife Moloney 2026-06-08 15:38:19 UTC
Fedora Linux 42 entered end-of-life (EOL) status on 2026-05-27.

Fedora Linux 42 is no longer maintained, which means that it
will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we
are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora Linux
please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Note that the version
field may be hidden. Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see
the version field.

If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against an
active release.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.