Spec URL: https://github.com/ByteHackr/volatility3-fedora-rpm/blob/main/python-volatility3.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/ByteHackr/volatility3-fedora-rpm/blob/main/python-volatility3-1.0.1-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Volatility is the world's most widely used framework for extracting digital artifacts from volatile memory (RAM) samples. The extraction techniques are performed completely independent of the system being investigated but offer visibility into the runtime state of the system. The framework is intended to introduce people to the techniques and complexities associated with extracting digital artifacts from volatile memory samples and provide a platform for further work into this exciting area of research. Fedora Account System Username: bytehackr https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/bytehackr/Security-Tools/fedora-34-i386/03004326-python-volatility3/fedora-review/review.txt https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bytehackr/Security-Tools/build/3004326/
The fedora-legal mailing list thread linked in the spec file, https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/OHECHDPLDJ7LLFUZXQMBBAXEXYTQMXOR/, concluded that the license was not acceptable in Fedora. A previous review request by a different packager, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767234, was closed for this reason. It seems like this is a clear-cut case of “the license is bad,” but I’m setting NEEDINFO just in case I missed something.
Ok, I will close the request as per the discussion and the license is not matching with fedora guideline.