Bug 2029077 - Please branch and build stalonetray for EPEL8 and EPEL9
Summary: Please branch and build stalonetray for EPEL8 and EPEL9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: stalonetray
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ben Boeckel
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: EPELPackagersSIG
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-12-04 18:43 UTC by Davide Cavalca
Modified: 2022-01-29 06:42 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: stalonetray-0.8.3-15.el9 stalonetray-0.8.3-15.el8
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-01-29 06:18:34 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Davide Cavalca 2021-12-04 18:43:40 UTC
Hi,

I am using CentOS Stream 8 and am using various packages in the EPEL[1] 
repository. I am interested in seeing stalonetray added to EPEL 8 and EPEL 9.

Would it be possible for you to maintain the package? While EPEL 
is more conservative in package maintenance[2][3], it does allow for
updates to later versions when needed.

I am happy to co-maintain (FAS: dcavalca); additionally, EPEL now has a packaging team[4] that can help co-maintain branches (FAS group: epel-packagers-sig), that can be added with either commit access or collaborator access to epel* branches (if it's not desired that they have access to the rawhide and f* branches).

The EPEL team appreciate your help with EPEL.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL

[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies

[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ

[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Packagers

Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2022-01-19 21:56:07 UTC
Will you be able to branch and build stalonetray in epel8 and epel9?
The EPEL Packaging SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer
if you do not wish to build it on epel8 and epel9.

Comment 2 Ben Boeckel 2022-01-20 00:22:55 UTC
Please feel free to request a branch, or do I need to do so myself as the owner?

Comment 3 Davide Cavalca 2022-01-20 00:28:49 UTC
You'll need to add the epel-packagers-sig group as a collaborator for epel* on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/stalonetray/addgroup and then I'll be able to request the branches and push updates for EPEL. Thanks!

Comment 4 Ben Boeckel 2022-01-20 00:54:23 UTC
I think I did it right. Let me know if anything further needs changed.

Comment 5 Davide Cavalca 2022-01-20 05:01:33 UTC
Thanks! Branches requested:
- epel8: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41142
- epel9: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41143

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-01-20 16:14:11 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-84f326a879 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-84f326a879

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-01-20 16:37:41 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2cdf1be0d6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2cdf1be0d6

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-01-21 17:37:55 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2cdf1be0d6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2cdf1be0d6

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2022-01-21 17:47:50 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-84f326a879 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-84f326a879

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2022-01-29 06:18:34 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2cdf1be0d6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2022-01-29 06:42:37 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-84f326a879 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.