Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/ocaml-logs/ocaml-logs.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/ocaml-logs/ocaml-logs-0.7.0-1.fc36.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: jjames Description: Logs provides a logging infrastructure for OCaml. Logging is performed on sources whose reporting level can be set independently. The log message report is decoupled from logging and is handled by a reporter. A few optional log reporters are distributed with the base library and the API lets you easily implement your own.
This looks fine to me, thanks for packaging it Jerry! I would suggest to drop the tests from check though, as they are just a waste of cycles atm. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/ ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [-]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "ISC License", "*No copyright* ISC License", "*No copyright* Public domain". 15 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/dan/fedora- scm/2029560-ocaml-logs/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Ocaml: [x]: This should never happen ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached diff). See: (this test has no URL) [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ocaml-logs-0.7.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm ocaml-logs-devel-0.7.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm ocaml-logs-debuginfo-0.7.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm ocaml-logs-debugsource-0.7.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm ocaml-logs-0.7.0-1.fc36.src.rpm ocaml-logs.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9.0-1 ['0.7.0-1.fc36', '0.7.0-1'] ocaml-logs.x86_64: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib64/ocaml/logs/logs.cmxs ocaml-logs.x86_64: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib64/ocaml/logs/logs_cli.cmxs ocaml-logs.x86_64: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib64/ocaml/logs/logs_fmt.cmxs ocaml-logs.x86_64: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib64/ocaml/logs/logs_lwt.cmxs ocaml-logs.x86_64: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib64/ocaml/logs/logs_threaded.cmxs ocaml-logs.x86_64: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib64/ocaml/logs/logs_top.cmxs ocaml-logs-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://erratique.ch/software/logs <urlopen error [Errno 101] Network is unreachable> ocaml-logs-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 3 warnings. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: ocaml-logs-debuginfo-0.7.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Source checksums ---------------- https://erratique.ch/software/logs/releases/logs-0.7.0.tbz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 86f4a02807eb1a297aae44977d9f61e419c31458a5d7b23c6f55575e8e69d5ca CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 86f4a02807eb1a297aae44977d9f61e419c31458a5d7b23c6f55575e8e69d5ca Requires -------- ocaml-logs (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ocaml(Asttypes) ocaml(Build_path_prefix_map) ocaml(CamlinternalFormatBasics) ocaml(CamlinternalLazy) ocaml(Cmdliner) ocaml(Cmi_format) ocaml(Env) ocaml(Fmt) ocaml(Ident) ocaml(Identifiable) ocaml(Load_path) ocaml(Location) ocaml(Logs) ocaml(Longident) ocaml(Lwt) ocaml(Lwt_sequence) ocaml(Misc) ocaml(Mutex) ocaml(Outcometree) ocaml(Parsetree) ocaml(Path) ocaml(Primitive) ocaml(Result) ocaml(Stdlib) ocaml(Stdlib__Array) ocaml(Stdlib__Buffer) ocaml(Stdlib__Digest) ocaml(Stdlib__Either) ocaml(Stdlib__Filename) ocaml(Stdlib__Format) ocaml(Stdlib__Hashtbl) ocaml(Stdlib__Int32) ocaml(Stdlib__Lazy) ocaml(Stdlib__Lexing) ocaml(Stdlib__List) ocaml(Stdlib__Map) ocaml(Stdlib__Obj) ocaml(Stdlib__Printexc) ocaml(Stdlib__Queue) ocaml(Stdlib__Result) ocaml(Stdlib__Seq) ocaml(Stdlib__Set) ocaml(Stdlib__Stack) ocaml(Stdlib__String) ocaml(Stdlib__Sys) ocaml(Stdlib__Uchar) ocaml(Subst) ocaml(Toploop) ocaml(Type_immediacy) ocaml(Types) ocaml(Warnings) ocamlx(Cmdliner) ocamlx(Fmt) ocamlx(Logs) ocamlx(Lwt) ocamlx(Mutex) ocamlx(Stdlib) ocamlx(Stdlib__Filename) ocamlx(Stdlib__Format) ocamlx(Stdlib__List) ocamlx(Stdlib__Map) ocamlx(Stdlib__String) ocamlx(Stdlib__Sys) rtld(GNU_HASH) ocaml-logs-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ocaml(Asttypes) ocaml(Build_path_prefix_map) ocaml(CamlinternalFormatBasics) ocaml(CamlinternalLazy) ocaml(Cmdliner) ocaml(Cmi_format) ocaml(Env) ocaml(Fmt) ocaml(Ident) ocaml(Identifiable) ocaml(Load_path) ocaml(Location) ocaml(Logs) ocaml(Longident) ocaml(Lwt) ocaml(Lwt_sequence) ocaml(Misc) ocaml(Mutex) ocaml(Outcometree) ocaml(Parsetree) ocaml(Path) ocaml(Primitive) ocaml(Result) ocaml(Stdlib) ocaml(Stdlib__Array) ocaml(Stdlib__Buffer) ocaml(Stdlib__Digest) ocaml(Stdlib__Either) ocaml(Stdlib__Filename) ocaml(Stdlib__Format) ocaml(Stdlib__Hashtbl) ocaml(Stdlib__Int32) ocaml(Stdlib__Lazy) ocaml(Stdlib__Lexing) ocaml(Stdlib__List) ocaml(Stdlib__Map) ocaml(Stdlib__Obj) ocaml(Stdlib__Printexc) ocaml(Stdlib__Queue) ocaml(Stdlib__Result) ocaml(Stdlib__Seq) ocaml(Stdlib__Set) ocaml(Stdlib__Stack) ocaml(Stdlib__String) ocaml(Stdlib__Sys) ocaml(Stdlib__Uchar) ocaml(Subst) ocaml(Toploop) ocaml(Type_immediacy) ocaml(Types) ocaml(Warnings) ocaml-cmdliner-devel(x86-64) ocaml-fmt-devel(x86-64) ocaml-logs(x86-64) ocaml-lwt-devel(x86-64) ocamlx(Cmdliner) ocamlx(Fmt) ocamlx(Logs) ocamlx(Lwt) ocamlx(Mutex) ocamlx(Stdlib) ocamlx(Stdlib__Filename) ocamlx(Stdlib__Format) ocamlx(Stdlib__List) ocamlx(Stdlib__Map) ocamlx(Stdlib__String) ocamlx(Stdlib__Sys) ocaml-logs-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ocaml-logs-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- ocaml-logs: ocaml(Logs) ocaml(Logs_cli) ocaml(Logs_fmt) ocaml(Logs_lwt) ocaml(Logs_threaded) ocaml(Logs_top) ocaml-logs ocaml-logs(x86-64) ocamlx(Logs) ocamlx(Logs_cli) ocamlx(Logs_fmt) ocamlx(Logs_lwt) ocamlx(Logs_threaded) ocamlx(Logs_top) ocaml-logs-devel: ocaml(Logs) ocaml(Logs_cli) ocaml(Logs_fmt) ocaml(Logs_lwt) ocaml(Logs_threaded) ocaml(Logs_top) ocaml-logs-devel ocaml-logs-devel(x86-64) ocamlx(Logs) ocamlx(Logs_cli) ocamlx(Logs_fmt) ocamlx(Logs_lwt) ocamlx(Logs_threaded) ocamlx(Logs_top) ocaml-logs-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) ocaml-logs-debuginfo ocaml-logs-debuginfo(x86-64) ocaml-logs-debugsource: ocaml-logs-debugsource ocaml-logs-debugsource(x86-64)
Thank you for the review, Dan! That's a good point about the tests. I will put a comment into the spec file to review the tests on each release and enable them if they become nontrivial.
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-logs
Built in Rawhide.