Moving to Marc-Andre since he owns the packages (we may need to fix the bugzilla components though)

This just makes sure what we have for RHEL 9.0 is the same for RHEL 8.6

Hi Marc-Andre,

I have encountered a failure with encrypted swtpm in RHEL8.6 gating job, but it can be passed in RHEL9 with swtpm-0.7.0-1.20211109gitb79fd91.el9.x86_64,so can I think this failure was caused by this bug? Or actually it's a new bug about vtpm encryption support in RHEL 8.6? 

If it was caused by this bug, can we solve it as soon as possible？ Because it will block our gating test.

Can you help me to check this issue? Thanks.

Test Version:
libvirt-7.10.0-1.module+el8.6.0+13502+4f24a11d.x86_64
qemu-kvm-6.2.0-1.module+el8.6.0+13725+61ae1949.x86_64
swtpm-0.6.0-2.20210607gitea627b3.module+el8.6.0+12861+13975d62.x86_64
libtpms-0.9.1-0.20211126git1ff6fe1f43.module+el8.6.0+13725+61ae1949.x86_64

# virsh dumpxml avocado-vt-vm1 | grep tpm -B4
...
    <tpm model='tpm-crb'>
      <backend type='emulator' version='2.0'>
        <encryption secret='b5714cef-5a84-45e1-bcde-adfe0d895b09'/>
      </backend>
    </tpm>

# virsh start avocado-vt-vm1
error: Failed to start domain 'avocado-vt-vm1'
error: argument unsupported: /usr/bin/swtpm does not support passing passphrase via file descriptor

But in RHEL9, this feature can be passed.

Test Version:
libvirt-7.10.0-1.el9.x86_64
qemu-kvm-6.2.0-1.el9.x86_64
swtpm-0.7.0-1.20211109gitb79fd91.el9.x86_64
libtpms-0.9.1-0.20211126git1ff6fe1f43.el9.x86_64

# virsh dumpxml avocado-vt-vm1 | grep tpm -B4
...
    <tpm model='tpm-crb'>
      <backend type='emulator' version='2.0'>
        <encryption secret='6bd21af4-c870-4bcf-9f5a-399265d0098c'/>
      </backend>
    </tpm>
# virsh start avocado-vt-vm1
Domain 'avocado-vt-vm1' started

(In reply to Meina Li from comment #5)
> # virsh start avocado-vt-vm1
> error: Failed to start domain 'avocado-vt-vm1'
> error: argument unsupported: /usr/bin/swtpm does not support passing
> passphrase via file descriptor

Hi, this is really strange. cmdarg-pwdfile-fd should be supported in swtpm 0.6.

Perhaps the simplest is now to update swtpm to 0.7 to fix this hopefully.

Could you check `swtpm_setup --print-capabilities` output? thanks

(In reply to Marc-Andre Lureau from comment #6)
> 
> Hi, this is really strange. cmdarg-pwdfile-fd should be supported in swtpm
> 0.6.
> 
> Perhaps the simplest is now to update swtpm to 0.7 to fix this hopefully.
> 
> Could you check `swtpm_setup --print-capabilities` output? thanks

# swtpm_setup --print-capabilities在里边
{ "type": "swtpm_setup", "features": [ "cmdarg-keyfile-fd", "cmdarg-pwdfile-fd", "tpm12-not-need-root", "tpm2-rsa-keysize-2048", "tpm2-rsa-keysize-3072" ] }

We can see cmdarg-pwdfile-fd inside.

Hi, 
The issue in comment 5 can not reproduce after upgrade swtpm to 0.7.0.

# avocado run --vt-type libvirt tpm_device..encrypted.basic  --vt-machine-type q35
JOB ID     : c78f63f73e7519a3ac82cfca9ee77964b4b45a90
JOB LOG    : /root/avocado/job-results/job-2022-01-12T21.14-c78f63f/job.log
 (1/1) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.virtual_devices.tpm_device.normal_test.tpm-crb_model.emulator.encrypted.basic: FAIL: VM 'avocado-vt-vm1' failed to start: error: Failed to start domain 'avocado-vt-vm1'\nerror: argument unsupported: /usr/bin/swtpm does not support passing passphrase via file descriptor (9.49 s)
RESULTS    : PASS 0 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 1 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT 0 | CANCEL 0
JOB TIME   : 10.08 s
# rpm -q libvirt qemu-kvm swtpm libtpms edk2-ovmf
libvirt-7.10.0-1.module+el8.6.0+13502+4f24a11d.x86_64
qemu-kvm-6.2.0-2.module+el8.6.0+13738+17338784.x86_64
swtpm-0.6.0-2.20210607gitea627b3.module+el8.6.0+12861+13975d62.x86_64
libtpms-0.9.1-0.20211126git1ff6fe1f43.module+el8.6.0+13725+61ae1949.x86_64
edk2-ovmf-20210527gite1999b264f1f-3.el8.noarch

# yum upgrade swtpm

JOB ID     : 29ce6abad4713c9a0670b670a41b2aacd476e0f0
JOB LOG    : /root/avocado/job-results/job-2022-01-12T21.17-29ce6ab/job.log
 (1/1) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.virtual_devices.tpm_device.normal_test.tpm-crb_model.emulator.encrypted.basic: PASS (69.33 s)
RESULTS    : PASS 1 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT 0 | CANCEL 0
JOB TIME   : 69.92 s
# rpm -q libvirt qemu-kvm swtpm libtpms edk2-ovmf
libvirt-7.10.0-1.module+el8.6.0+13502+4f24a11d.x86_64
qemu-kvm-6.2.0-2.module+el8.6.0+13738+17338784.x86_64
swtpm-0.7.0-1.20211109gitb79fd91.module+el8.6.0+13831+a03bf401.x86_64
libtpms-0.9.1-0.20211126git1ff6fe1f43.module+el8.6.0+13725+61ae1949.x86_64
edk2-ovmf-20210527gite1999b264f1f-3.el8.noarch


And since swtpm-0.7.0-1.*el8.6.0 is available, is this bug need to be moved to ON_QA？

Thanks.

Vtpm regression test for linux guest PASS:
https://libvirt-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/view/libvirt/view/RHEL-8.6%20x86_64/job/libvirt-RHEL-8.6-runtest-x86_64-function-tpm_emulator/21/testReport/
(2 failed by existing bz2025520)
libvirt-8.0.0-1.module+el8.6.0+13888+55157bfb.x86_64
qemu-kvm-6.2.0-4.module+el8.6.0+13919+adb438db.x86_64
kernel-4.18.0-359.el8.x86_64
swtpm-0.7.0-1.20211109gitb79fd91.module+el8.6.0+13853+e8cd34b9
libtpms-0.9.1-0.20211126git1ff6fe1f43

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: virt:rhel and virt-devel:rhel security, bug fix, and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:1759