Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 2031035

Summary: Add rhel-8.6.0 machine types for RHEL 8.6 [x86]
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Cornelia Huck <cohuck>
Component: qemu-kvmAssignee: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert>
qemu-kvm sub component: Machine Types QA Contact: jingzhao <jinzhao>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA Docs Contact:
Severity: unspecified    
Priority: unspecified CC: berrange, coli, dgilbert, jinzhao, virt-maint, ymankad
Version: 8.6Keywords: Triaged
Target Milestone: rcFlags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: qemu-kvm-6.2.0-5.module+el8.6.0+14006+80bd780c Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-10 13:24:21 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2031032    

Description Cornelia Huck 2021-12-10 11:16:42 UTC
The rhel-8.6.0 machine types need to be added for x86.

Comment 1 John Ferlan 2021-12-10 20:58:37 UTC
How does this differ from existing bug 2022604?  Can we close this as a duplicate of that - being sure to update bug 2031032 with the (older) reference...

Comment 2 Cornelia Huck 2021-12-13 08:52:25 UTC
(In reply to John Ferlan from comment #1)
> How does this differ from existing bug 2022604?  Can we close this as a
> duplicate of that - being sure to update bug 2031032 with the (older)
> reference...

Same as for the other bug(s) -- the existing bug deals with compat values, this one with the actual machine types.

Comment 3 Daniel Berrangé 2021-12-16 12:09:59 UTC
Note historically the RHEL x86 machine types have overridden some of the SMBIOS defaults:

    pcmc->smbios_stream_product = "RHEL-AV";
    pcmc->smbios_stream_version = "8.5.0";

In 8.6,  RHEL-AV was folded back into RHEL. So there's a question of whether we should still refer to the 'smbios_stream_product' as "RHEL-AV" or revert to "RHEL"

IIUC, this info is used as a hook for things like the Windows drivers, so the safe option might be to leave it as 'RHEL-AV' for the remainder of RHEL-8.x series, and only change to 'RHEL' in the RHEL-9.x series machine types.

Comment 4 Dr. David Alan Gilbert 2021-12-16 19:46:47 UTC
(In reply to Daniel Berrangé from comment #3)
> Note historically the RHEL x86 machine types have overridden some of the
> SMBIOS defaults:
> 
>     pcmc->smbios_stream_product = "RHEL-AV";
>     pcmc->smbios_stream_version = "8.5.0";
> 
> In 8.6,  RHEL-AV was folded back into RHEL. So there's a question of whether
> we should still refer to the 'smbios_stream_product' as "RHEL-AV" or revert
> to "RHEL"
> 
> IIUC, this info is used as a hook for things like the Windows drivers, so
> the safe option might be to leave it as 'RHEL-AV' for the remainder of
> RHEL-8.x series,

That seems safest; I'd rather not change anything in drivers if not essential.

> and only change to 'RHEL' in the RHEL-9.x series machine types.

Do we even have to do that?  If we just left it witht he -AV on the end it wouldn't hurt anyone
and would give a chance for the same image to work on 8 and 9

Comment 5 Daniel Berrangé 2021-12-17 13:18:59 UTC
(In reply to Dr. David Alan Gilbert from comment #4)
> (In reply to Daniel Berrangé from comment #3)
> > IIUC, this info is used as a hook for things like the Windows drivers, so
> > the safe option might be to leave it as 'RHEL-AV' for the remainder of
> > RHEL-8.x series,
> 
> That seems safest; I'd rather not change anything in drivers if not
> essential.
> 
> > and only change to 'RHEL' in the RHEL-9.x series machine types.
> 
> Do we even have to do that?  If we just left it witht he -AV on the end it
> wouldn't hurt anyone
> and would give a chance for the same image to work on 8 and 9

We don't have to change it, I just felt it looks wierd to be refering to a product that no longer exists. even in RHEL-8 it was a little weird because the same machine types were used by RHEL & RHEL-AV.

I put a similar comment on the corresponding rhel9 bug 1945666 so we can consider it separately.

Comment 14 Yanan Fu 2022-01-27 02:29:02 UTC
QE bot(pre verify): Set 'Verified:Tested,SanityOnly' as gating/tier1 test pass.

Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-10 13:24:21 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: virt:rhel and virt-devel:rhel security, bug fix, and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:1759