Bug 2034801 - Deployment fails at task [Reload NetworkManager] when we have large VF per pF
Summary: Deployment fails at task [Reload NetworkManager] when we have large VF per pF
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: os-net-config
Version: 16.1 (Train)
Hardware: All
OS: All
high
medium
Target Milestone: z4
: 17.1
Assignee: Robin Jarry
QA Contact: Sanjay Upadhyay
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2219830
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-12-22 08:14 UTC by Shailesh Chhabdiya
Modified: 2025-01-06 03:37 UTC (History)
23 users (show)

Fixed In Version: os-net-config-14.2.1-17.1.20240917140802.61d7bd7.el9osttrunk
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
In the SR-IOV deployment guide [1], the below changes shall be amended Create a /home/stack/osp17_ref/overcloud-nm-config.yaml like [2] In the baremetal_deployment.yaml [3], add the above playbook under the ComputeSriov Role. ansible_playbooks: - playbook: /home/stack/ospd-17.1-geneve-ovn-dpdk-sriov-ctlplane-dataplane-bonding-hybrid/playbooks/overcloud-nm-config.yaml extra_vars: reboot_wait_timeout: 900 - playbook: /usr/share/ansible/tripleo-playbooks/cli-overcloud-node-kernelargs.yaml extra_vars: reboot_wait_timeout: 600 kernel_args: 'default_hugepagesz=1GB hugepagesz=1G hugepages=32 iommu=pt intel_iommu=on isolcpus=1-11,13-23' tuned_profile: 'cpu-partitioning' tuned_isolated_cores: '1-11,13-23' [1] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/17.1/html-single/configuring_network_functions_virtualization/index#deploy-sriov-tech_rhosp-nfv [2] https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/nfv-qe/+/451731/1/tht/17.1/common-defaults/playbooks/overcloud-nm-config.yaml [3] https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/nfv-qe/+/451731/1/tht/setups/panther02/17.1/ospd-17.1-geneve-ovn-dpdk-sriov-ctlplane-dataplane-bonding-hybrid/network/baremetal_deployment.yaml
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-11-21 09:38:09 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker NFV-2376 0 None None None 2022-01-05 07:39:55 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker OSP-11921 0 None None None 2021-12-22 08:27:22 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHOSPDOC-2018 0 None None None 2024-09-18 17:17:54 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2024:9974 0 None None None 2024-11-21 09:38:12 UTC

Description Shailesh Chhabdiya 2021-12-22 08:14:17 UTC 
Description of problem:
Deployment fails at task [Reload NetworkManager] when we  have large VF per pF

64 VF per PF

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHOSP16.1.6

Actual results:
NetworkManager Reload fails

Expected results:
NetworkManager Reload should go well
Comment 22 Karthik Sundaravel 2023-10-18 05:04:13 UTC 
Please verify the scenario in OSP17.1 using the comment #21
Comment 35 Jenny-Anne Lynch 2024-01-08 11:33:08 UTC 
Made minor edits to doc text.
Comment 47 Robin Jarry 2024-08-28 10:47:20 UTC 
@supadhya I think bz 2219830 would actually fix the problem.
Comment 49 Sanjay Upadhyay 2024-11-04 12:28:11 UTC 
(In reply to Robin Jarry from comment #47)
> @supadhya I think bz 2219830 would actually fix the problem.

sorry did not see this ^^ I saw the change by @mnietoji - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219830#c16
And I think this can be closed as well.
Comment 50 Miguel Angel Nieto 2024-11-18 07:49:07 UTC 
I checked in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219830 configuring multiple vfs per pf. In total i configured 96 vfs (2 pfs with 32 vfs each and 2 pfs with 16 vfs each) and I was not able to reproduce the issue in 17.1.

So, I think this bz can be close
Comment 55 errata-xmlrpc 2024-11-21 09:38:09 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (RHOSP 17.1.4 bug fix and enhancement advisory), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2024:9974
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.