SRPM: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/libchipcard/libchipcard-5.1.6-1.fc35.src.rpm SPEC: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/libchipcard/libchipcard.spec Description: Libchipcard allows easy access to smart cards. It provides basic access to memory and processor cards and has special support for German medical cards, German "GeldKarte" and HBCI (homebanking) cards (both type 0 and type 1). It accesses the readers via CTAPI or IFD interfaces and has successfully been tested with Towitoko, Kobil, SCM, Orga, Omnikey and Reiner-SCT readers.
as noted at https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1b812725a9, a locally built libchipcard works well together with the updated versions of aqbanking and gwenhywfar (and gnucash).
And, just to note: the spec's files requirements are well identified: BuildRequires: gcc-c++ BuildRequires: gwenhywfar-devel BuildRequires: libsysfs-devel BuildRequires: pcsc-lite-devel BuildRequires: zlib-devel configure, make, make install: works wonderfully with libchipcard-5.99.1beta
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [?]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1 [obsolete FSF postal address (Temple Place)]", "FSF All Permissive License", "[generated file]", "FSF Unlimited License (with License Retention) GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or later", "FSF Unlimited License [generated file]", "X11 License [generated file]", "*No copyright* GNU Lesser General Public License", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later", "FSF Unlimited License (with License Retention) GNU General Public License, Version 2", "FSF Unlimited License (with License Retention)", "GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Temple Place)]", "*No copyright* [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Temple Place)]", "GNU General Public License". 232 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/FedoraPackaging/libchipcard/2035958-libchipcard/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79(gwenhywfar), /usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct(gwenhywfar) [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [?]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 143360 bytes in 20 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [!]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Unversioned so-files -------------------- libchipcard: /usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/chiptanusb.so libchipcard: /usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/ddvcard.so libchipcard: /usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/starcoscard.so libchipcard: /usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/zkacard.so Source checksums ---------------- https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/attachments/download/382/libchipcard-5.1.6.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 6c07f527417f7562074f99012da4d11eb4dbafd33f49e66b442ccd6e3b8cfd20 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 6c07f527417f7562074f99012da4d11eb4dbafd33f49e66b442ccd6e3b8cfd20 Requires -------- libchipcard (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/sh libc.so.6()(64bit) libchipcard.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit) libgwenhywfar.so.79()(64bit) libpcsclite.so.1()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) libchipcard-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config gwenhywfar-devel libchipcard(x86-64) libchipcard.so.6()(64bit) libchipcard-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libchipcard-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- libchipcard: libchipcard libchipcard(x86-64) libchipcard.so.6()(64bit) libchipcard-devel: libchipcard-devel libchipcard-devel(x86-64) pkgconfig(libchipcard-client) pkgconfig(libchipcard-server) libchipcard-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) libchipcard-debuginfo libchipcard-debuginfo(x86-64) libchipcard.so.6.1.6-5.1.6-1.fc38.x86_64.debug()(64bit) libchipcard-debugsource: libchipcard-debugsource libchipcard-debugsource(x86-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.8.0 (e988316) last change: 2022-04-07 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2035958 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, C/C++ Disabled plugins: fonts, Ocaml, Python, Haskell, R, Perl, PHP, Java, SugarActivi ty Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH $ rpmlint libchipcard-5.1.6-1.fc38.src.rpm ======================================== rpmlint session starts ======================================== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 libchipcard.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A library for easy access to smart cards (chipcards). libchipcard.spec:40: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} libchipcard.spec:41: W: macro-in-comment %{_lib} libchipcard.spec:41: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} libchipcard.spec:42: W: macro-in-comment %endif ========= 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 1.2 s ========= $ rpmlint libchipcard-5.1.6-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm ======================================== rpmlint session starts ======================================== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 libchipcard.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot A library for easy access to smart cards (chipcards). libchipcard.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-excessive-dependency libgcc_s.so.1 libchipcard.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-excessive-dependency libstdc++.so.6 libchipcard.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/chipcard/chipcardc.conf.default libchipcard.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/chipcard/chipcardc.conf.example libchipcard.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cardcommander libchipcard.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary chipcard-config libchipcard.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary chipcard-tool libchipcard.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary geldkarte libchipcard.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kvkcard libchipcard.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary memcard libchipcard.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary usbtan-test libchipcard.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zkacard-tool libchipcard.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/libchipcard/COPYING libchipcard.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 5.1.2-1 ['5.1.6-1.fc38', '5.1.6-1'] libchipcard.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /etc/chipcard/chipcardc.conf.example /etc/chipcard/chipcardc.conf.default libchipcard.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/chipcard/cards/cyberjack_pcsc/processorcard.xml /usr/share/chipcard/cards/cyberjack_pcsc/card.xml:/usr/share/chipcard/cards/cyberjack_pcsc/kvk.xml libchipcard.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/chipcard-config ======= 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 15 warnings, 3 badness; has taken 110.9 s ======== $ rpmlint libchipcard-devel-5.1.6-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm ======================================== rpmlint session starts ======================================== rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 libchipcard-devel.x86_64: W: makefile-junk /usr/share/doc/libchipcard-devel/doc/Makefile.am ========= 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.4 s ========= Comments: a) Signing key is available at https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/attachments/381/libchipcard-5.1.6.tar.gz.asc - this can be used to verify the source code b) Some files are under GPL: GNU General Public License -------------------------- libchipcard-5.1.6/src/tools/kvkcard/main.c libchipcard-5.1.6/src/tools/memcard/main.c GNU General Public License v2.0 or later ---------------------------------------- libchipcard-5.1.6/ltmain.sh GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [generated file] --------------------------------------------------------- libchipcard-5.1.6/compile libchipcard-5.1.6/depcomp libchipcard-5.1.6/missing GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Temple Place)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- libchipcard-5.1.6/src/tools/cardcommander/cardcommander.cpp GNU General Public License v3.0 or later ---------------------------------------- libchipcard-5.1.6/config.guess libchipcard-5.1.6/config.sub
Dear Benson, thank you for running these tests/checks. Would you mind providing a high level summary for interested parties who cannot well interpret the tests? What is your conclusion from these tests? Ta
Updated: SRPM: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/libchipcard/libchipcard-5.1.6-2.fc36.src.rpm SPEC: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/libchipcard/libchipcard.spec Commented out key verification as I can't find a valid keyring.
I am in touch with the developers elsewhere - should I ask them about a valid keyring for verification?
Please! I downloaded the public key for the signature but it didn't work and I couldn't locate a keyring on the website.
ok, asked via https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/issues/287
It seems the keyring may take a while. Can proceed without it.
Indeed.
Please update the source url: https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/attachments/download/382/libchipcard-5.1.6.tar.gz Possibly the signature can be removed: https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/attachments/download/381/libchipcard-5.1.6.tar.gz.asc Perhaps leave a comment in the spec file that the signing key is not known.
SRPM: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/libchipcard/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc37.src.rpm SPEC: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/libchipcard/libchipcard.spec Done.
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [?]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1 [obsolete FSF postal address (Temple Place)]", "FSF All Permissive License", "[generated file]", "FSF Unlimited License (with License Retention) GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or later", "FSF Unlimited License [generated file]", "X11 License [generated file]", "*No copyright* GNU Lesser General Public License", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later", "FSF Unlimited License (with License Retention) GNU General Public License, Version 2", "FSF Unlimited License (with License Retention)", "GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Temple Place)]", "*No copyright* [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Temple Place)]", "GNU General Public License". 232 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/FedoraPackaging/reviews/libchipcard/2035958-libchipcard/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79(gwenhywfar), /usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct(gwenhywfar) [c]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [?]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 143360 bytes in 20 files. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify occurs outside of %prep. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 4 libchipcard-debugsource.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/src/ct/chiptanusb/dummy.c libchipcard-debugsource.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/src/ct/ddvcard/dummy.c libchipcard-debugsource.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/src/ct/starcoscard/dummy.c libchipcard-debugsource.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/src/ct/zkacard/dummy.c libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/.dwz/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64 libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/cardcommander-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/chipcard-tool-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/geldkarte-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/kvkcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/memcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/usbtan-test-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/zkacard-tool-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/chiptanusb.so-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/ddvcard.so-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/starcoscard.so-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/zkacard.so-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libchipcard.so.6.1.6-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/debug/.dwz/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64 libchipcard.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-excessive-dependency libgcc_s.so.1 libchipcard.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-excessive-dependency libstdc++.so.6 libchipcard.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/chipcard/chipcardc.conf.default libchipcard.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/chipcard/chipcardc.conf.example libchipcard.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cardcommander libchipcard.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary chipcard-config libchipcard.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary chipcard-tool libchipcard.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary geldkarte libchipcard.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kvkcard libchipcard.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary memcard libchipcard.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary usbtan-test libchipcard.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zkacard-tool libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: E: missing-PT_GNU_STACK-section /usr/lib/debug/.dwz/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64 libchipcard-devel.x86_64: W: makefile-junk /usr/share/doc/libchipcard-devel/doc/Makefile.am libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/cardcommander-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug /usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8) ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/cardcommander-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug' libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/chipcard-tool-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug /usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8) ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/chipcard-tool-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug' libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/geldkarte-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug /usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8) ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/geldkarte-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug' libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/kvkcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug /usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8) ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/kvkcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug' libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/memcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug /usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8) ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/memcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug' libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/usbtan-test-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug /usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8) ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/usbtan-test-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug' libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/zkacard-tool-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug /usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8) ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/zkacard-tool-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug' libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/chiptanusb.so-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug /usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8) ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/chiptanusb.so-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug' libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/ddvcard.so-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug /usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8) ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/ddvcard.so-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug' libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/starcoscard.so-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug /usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8) ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/starcoscard.so-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug' libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/zkacard.so-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug /usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8) ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/zkacard.so-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug' libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libchipcard.so.6.1.6-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug /usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8) ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libchipcard.so.6.1.6-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug' libchipcard.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/libchipcard/COPYING libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/debug/.dwz libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/debug/.dwz libchipcard.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /etc/chipcard/chipcardc.conf.example /etc/chipcard/chipcardc.conf.default libchipcard.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/chipcard/cards/cyberjack_pcsc/processorcard.xml /usr/share/chipcard/cards/cyberjack_pcsc/card.xml:/usr/share/chipcard/cards/cyberjack_pcsc/kvk.xml libchipcard-debugsource.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/src/lib/client/base/card_imp.h /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/libchipcard5/chipcard/card_imp.h libchipcard-debugsource.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/src/lib/client/cards/geldkarte/geldkarte_blog.h /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/libchipcard5/chipcard/cards/geldkarte_blog.h libchipcard-debugsource.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/src/lib/client/cards/geldkarte/geldkarte_llog.h /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/libchipcard5/chipcard/cards/geldkarte_llog.h libchipcard-debugsource.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/src/lib/client/cards/geldkarte/geldkarte_values.h /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/libchipcard5/chipcard/cards/geldkarte_values.h libchipcard-debugsource.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/src/lib/client/cards/hiinsurancedata.h /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/libchipcard5/chipcard/cards/hiinsurancedata.h libchipcard-debugsource.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/src/lib/client/cards/hipersonaldata.h /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/libchipcard5/chipcard/cards/hipersonaldata.h libchipcard-debugsource.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/src/lib/client/cards/starcos/starcos_keydescr.h /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/libchipcard5/chipcard/cards/starcos_keydescr.h libchipcard-debugsource.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/src/lib/client/base/client.h /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/libchipcard5/chipcard/client.h libchipcard-debugsource.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/src/lib/sharedstuff/pininfo.h /usr/src/debug/libchipcard-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64/libchipcard5/chipcard/sharedstuff/pininfo.h libchipcard.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/chipcard-config libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/00/edfb4b9bd3560a65bcdfff8cbefac35ed74f11 ../../../.build-id/00/edfb4b9bd3560a65bcdfff8cbefac35ed74f11 libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/1d/e77a8ab816eae7ae185286e012a669ba3e17ef ../../../.build-id/1d/e77a8ab816eae7ae185286e012a669ba3e17ef libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/1e/7a527ff1422aaaf61a4f323b112dea632889b0 ../../../.build-id/1e/7a527ff1422aaaf61a4f323b112dea632889b0 libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/33/f51eef6f1100911948bb473928582d5a9c0737 ../../../.build-id/33/f51eef6f1100911948bb473928582d5a9c0737 libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/44/bed6240c23b66dcaeb9013d16889c0f0d89841 ../../../.build-id/44/bed6240c23b66dcaeb9013d16889c0f0d89841 libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/67/b916ecbef20df3d8862f5e2b2e06c08824b5f3 ../../../.build-id/67/b916ecbef20df3d8862f5e2b2e06c08824b5f3 libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/79/4c1ba4c79df2a23d71c4e8e77cb3c402d9d25f ../../../.build-id/79/4c1ba4c79df2a23d71c4e8e77cb3c402d9d25f libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/88/7c37a8986f5315a713d57d26ea91ce25646e11 ../../../.build-id/88/7c37a8986f5315a713d57d26ea91ce25646e11 libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/9e/e0c4128f01a1fcc36d67c28e7c6eeef79fccdd ../../../.build-id/9e/e0c4128f01a1fcc36d67c28e7c6eeef79fccdd libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/bd/1e8e164d44e796faf6c1ac0147477497ca6211 ../../../.build-id/bd/1e8e164d44e796faf6c1ac0147477497ca6211 libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c0/e553e9f8ad47d24da4fea1b16ce5e14aebb2c2 ../../../.build-id/c0/e553e9f8ad47d24da4fea1b16ce5e14aebb2c2 libchipcard-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/e3/d742a438d2f6d08ea1dc5293b5ea24ae66c60f ../../../.build-id/e3/d742a438d2f6d08ea1dc5293b5ea24ae66c60f 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 21 errors, 50 warnings, 21 badness; has taken 48.4 s Unversioned so-files -------------------- libchipcard: /usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/chiptanusb.so libchipcard: /usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/ddvcard.so libchipcard: /usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/starcoscard.so libchipcard: /usr/lib64/gwenhywfar/plugins/79/ct/zkacard.so Source checksums ---------------- https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/attachments/download/381/libchipcard-5.1.6.tar.gz.asc : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 61fa18f1c3e137ff9e4843f562f47895d312350294f4cf71e65116b3005c8b92 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 61fa18f1c3e137ff9e4843f562f47895d312350294f4cf71e65116b3005c8b92 https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/attachments/download/382/libchipcard-5.1.6.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 6c07f527417f7562074f99012da4d11eb4dbafd33f49e66b442ccd6e3b8cfd20 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 6c07f527417f7562074f99012da4d11eb4dbafd33f49e66b442ccd6e3b8cfd20 Requires -------- libchipcard (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/sh libc.so.6()(64bit) libchipcard.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit) libgwenhywfar.so.79()(64bit) libpcsclite.so.1()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) libchipcard-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config gwenhywfar-devel libchipcard(x86-64) libchipcard.so.6()(64bit) libchipcard-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libchipcard-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- libchipcard: libchipcard libchipcard(x86-64) libchipcard.so.6()(64bit) libchipcard-devel: libchipcard-devel libchipcard-devel(x86-64) pkgconfig(libchipcard-client) pkgconfig(libchipcard-server) libchipcard-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) libchipcard-debuginfo libchipcard-debuginfo(x86-64) libchipcard.so.6.1.6-5.1.6-3.fc38.x86_64.debug()(64bit) libchipcard-debugsource: libchipcard-debugsource libchipcard-debugsource(x86-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2035958 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: C/C++, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Perl, Python, Ocaml, SugarActivity, fonts, Ruby, PHP, R, Haskell, Java Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH Comments: a) Some of the libraries are unversioned. Maybe an issue should be raised upstream, or Fedora specific versioning should be applied. b) Builds fail on Fedora ELN, https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fed500/libchipcard/build/4887683/ but others are ok. c) Since the signing key is not known at present, should the line Source1: https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/attachments/download/381/libchipcard-%{version}.tar.gz.asc also be commented out? d) Licensing breakdown should be described in the spec file
ad a) versioning of so files: I asked for this at https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/issues/289
Ingli - Thanks for raising issues in aquamaniac bug tracking system. The checks are mostly to see if the library can be incorporated into Fedora. Might you be able to test whether the library works by using the copr repository: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fed500/libchipcard
Sorry, Ingli should be Ingmar.
The ELN builds fail because gwenhywfar is missing. Thank you for filing the solib versioning upstream. I see no harm in including the signature inthe source, it will be easier to add gpg validation when the keyring is available. What do you recommend for the License field?
Hi, re signature, I was pointed to this key https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?search=0x4A977416&fingerprint=on&op=index
Thanks Ingmar. For the licenses, one needs to explain which files correspond to which licenses. Majority of files are typically under one license and can be lumped together under "all others".
SRPM: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/libchipcard/libchipcard-5.1.6-4.fc37.src.rpm SPEC: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/libchipcard/libchipcard.spec That keyring gives an invalid signature. Uncomment the zcat line to test. Updated licensing.
Amazing role I am taking – human translating between platforms :) re the versioning of the so-files, the developer suggests at https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/issues/289#note-1 > Those are plugin modules which aren't generally versioned. How would that work anyway? The modules are loaded with dlopen() which doesn't provide a mechanism for versioning. > However, those modules are versioned in regards to the Gwenhywfar version they are compiled for (using specific paths for different versions of Gwenhywfar). Since installing multiple versions of Libchipcard isn't supported anyway this should be enough.
That makes sense to me.
The following works for me: %gpgverify seems to use gpgv https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/54#request_diff The key is available at https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xe9899d784a977416 If this text is saved as aqbanking.key then one can do the following $ gpg --dearmor < aqbanking.key > aqbanking.gpg $ gpgv --keyring=./aqbanking.gpg libchipcard-5.1.6.tar.gz.asc libchipcard-5.1.6.tar.gz gpgv: Signature made Fri 17 Sep 2021 06:46:42 PM EAT gpgv: using RSA key 42400AF5EB2A17F0A69BB551E9899D784A977416 gpgv: Good signature from "AqBanking Package Key <packages>" One can also use $gpg --receive-keys 0x4A977416 gpg: key E9899D784A977416: public key "AqBanking Package Key <packages>" imported gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: imported: 1 $ gpg --verify libchipcard-5.1.6.tar.gz.asc gpg: assuming signed data in 'libchipcard-5.1.6.tar.gz' gpg: Signature made Fri 17 Sep 2021 06:46:42 PM EAT gpg: using RSA key 42400AF5EB2A17F0A69BB551E9899D784A977416 gpg: Good signature from "AqBanking Package Key <packages>" [unknown] gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 4240 0AF5 EB2A 17F0 A69B B551 E989 9D78 4A97 7416 Though this would only work when the build has internet access, but is an easier way to verify things work before adding the key file to the sources.
Right, and the build in koji will not have internet access.
Obtain the text content of https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xe9899d784a977416 and save it as keyfile.asc Then update the following lines of the spec file # Download is PHP form at http://www.aquamaniac.de/sites/download/packages.php Source0: https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/attachments/download/382/libchipcard-%{version}.tar.gz Source1: https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/attachments/download/381/libchipcard-%{version}.tar.gz.asc License: LGPL-2.0-only and GPL-2.0-or-later and LGPL-2.1-or-later # Most LGPL 2 # LGPL 2.1+: src/lib/version.h # GPLv2+: src/tools/cardcommander/cardcommander.cpp, src/tools/kvkcard/main.c, src/tools/memcard/main.c # Keyfile obtained from https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xe9899d784a977416 Source2: keyfile.asc URL: https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/projects/libchipcard and %autosetup -n %{name}-%{version} %{gpgverify} --keyring='%{SOURCE2}' --signature='%{SOURCE1}' --data='%{SOURCE0}' Further comments: a) GeldKarte will be withdrawn in 2024 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geldkarte b) Maybe it is helpful to have the library developers as co-maintainers? The related package gwenhywfar has a spec file template in the source repository https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/projects/gwenhywfar/repository
Thank you, that worked! SRPM: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/libchipcard/libchipcard-5.1.6-5.fc37.src.rpm SPEC: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/libchipcard/libchipcard.spec Possibly, they may request that. gwenhywfar is already in Fedora.
In the spec file, can you remove # Signing key is not known and add location signing key was obtained from # Keyfile obtained from https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xe9899d784a977416 With those changes, approved
Plugin library non-versioning seems ok based on https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_downstream_so_name_versioning
Thank you both!
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libchipcard
FEDORA-2022-413ad16875 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-413ad16875
FEDORA-2022-413ad16875 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-413ad16875` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-413ad16875 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2022-413ad16875 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.