Please branch and build gumbo-parser in epel9. If you do not wish to maintain gumbo-parser in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package. I have tested the rawhide version and it builds without any changes in epel9.
Just a friendly reminder that I'd like gumbo-parser in epel9. If you do not wish to maintain gumbo-parser in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package.
(In reply to Troy Dawson from comment #1) > Just a friendly reminder that I'd like gumbo-parser in epel9. > > If you do not wish to maintain gumbo-parser in epel9, I do not use RHEL and am not interested in being used to support RHAT's non-free products. > or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, > I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package. Presuming "tdawson" is your FAS name, I added you as "collaborator" and BZ-contact for epel*. This should enable you to branch yourself.
Thank You
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0996be1ea4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0996be1ea4
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0996be1ea4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0996be1ea4 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0996be1ea4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.