Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 2037186

Summary: [ESXi][RHEL9.0] "invalid signature tag Archivesize" error when use rpm command
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: ldu <ldu>
Component: rpmAssignee: Michal Domonkos <mdomonko>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: swm-qe
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 9.0CC: boyang, hrao, mbanas, mdomonko, pmatilai, vmware-gos-qa, yacao
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: rpm-4.16.1.3-11.el9 Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-17 16:01:23 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description ldu 2022-01-05 07:39:24 UTC
Description of problem:
"invalid signature tag Archivesize" on rpm packages with rpm version “rpm-4.16.1.3-7.el9.x86_64“
 
[root@bootp-73-199-35 ~]# rpm -ivh install4j_linux-x64_9_0_1.rpm 
error: install4j_linux-x64_9_0_1.rpm: invalid signature tag Archivesize (1046)
error: install4j_linux-x64_9_0_1.rpm cannot be installed

This issue have fixed on github, so could backport it to RHEL 9?
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1635


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rpm-4.16.1.3-7.el9.x86_64

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install RHEL 9 as VM on ESXi
2.Boot up and login
3.rpm -ivh install4j_linux-x64_9_0_1.rpm

Actual results:
rpm -ivh install4j_linux-x64_9_0_1.rpm 
error: install4j_linux-x64_9_0_1.rpm: invalid signature tag Archivesize (1046)
error: install4j_linux-x64_9_0_1.rpm cannot be installed

Expected results:
The package could be install successfully.

Additional info:
This issue have fixed on rpm-4.17 on git hub.

Comment 1 Panu Matilainen 2022-01-05 07:55:34 UTC
Ideally this would be fixed via rebase to 4.16.2 which is yet to be released, but yeah we could and should fix it one way or the other.

Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-17 16:01:23 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (new packages: rpm), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:4021