RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2039045 - /etc/containers/registries.conf missing registry.redhat.io terms-based registry definition
Summary: /etc/containers/registries.conf missing registry.redhat.io terms-based regist...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: containers-common
Version: 8.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jindrich Novy
QA Contact: Yuhui Jiang
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2088139
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-01-10 19:43 UTC by John Francini
Modified: 2023-09-18 04:30 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: containers-common-1-29.el8
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 2088139 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-11-08 09:14:55 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-107330 0 None None None 2022-01-10 19:44:58 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2022:7457 0 None None None 2022-11-08 09:15:35 UTC

Description John Francini 2022-01-10 19:43:38 UTC 
Description of problem:

After Bug 1977280, the list of unqualified search registries was changed from

['registry.access.redhat.com', 'registry.redhat.io', 'docker.io']

to 

["registry.fedoraproject.org", "registry.access.redhat.com", "registry.centos.org", "docker.io"]

which excludes the terms-based Red Hat container registry.

In addition to the customer issues likely caused by the omission of this registry, it also breaks the Red Hat Software Certification suite, which checks for the explicit presence of both registry.access.redhat.com and registry.redhat.io in the unqualified search registries list.

This change was introduced by RHSA-2021:4154.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

containers-common-2:1-2.module+el8.5.0+12582+56d94c81.noarch

How reproducible:

Always.


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install containers-common-2:1-2.module+el8.5.0+12582+56d94c81.noarch

2. Open /etc/containers/registries.conf in less(1) or an editor.

3. Observe that line 22 of this file contains
unqualified-search-registries = ["registry.fedoraproject.org", "registry.access.redhat.com", "registry.centos.org", "docker.io"]


Actual results:


Expected results:

Line 22 should be edited to be 

unqualified-search-registries = ["registry.fedoraproject.org", "registry.access.redhat.com", "registry.centos.org", "docker.io", "registry.redhat.io"]

Additional info:
Comment 4 Daniel Walsh 2022-05-18 17:38:54 UTC 
This looks good to me.
Comment 5 Jindrich Novy 2022-05-18 17:50:52 UTC 
Thanks for the review Dan. Can we get qa ack please?

Is there a similar change needed in RHEL9 too?
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2022-11-08 09:14:55 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: container-tools:rhel8 security, bug fix, and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:7457
Comment 14 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-18 04:30:03 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.