Bug 20399 – .spec file is wrong; popt.h is wrong

Bug 20399 - .spec file is wrong; popt.h is wrong

Summary:	.spec file is wrong; popt.h is wrong

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	popt (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	7.0
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Jeff Johnson
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2000-11-05 18:16 EST by Kenneth Topp
Modified:	2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2000-11-05 18:16:57 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Kenneth Topp 2000-11-05 18:16:55 EST

it seems to me that: 
ftp://ftp.rpm.org/pub/rpm/dist/rpm-4.0.x/
is more authoratative then:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/code/popt
(which is listed in the popt.h file)
Even if it was ftp.redhat.com
the code directory was moved to /pub/redhat/code/popt
but that directory has a only version 1.2


Also, the spec in rh7 says License: GPL, and the tar ball says:
License: LGPL, when the COPYING file says XFree86 License.

Please update the popt.h header, and .spec file to be accurate.

Thanks

Comment 1 Jeff Johnson 2000-12-30 14:08:31 EST

popt has a X Consortium license (per Erik Troan).

This should be reflected in popt sources from CVS.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.