Spec URL: https://pagure.io/mobile-plasma-phonebook/raw/main/f/plasma-mobile-phonebook.spec SRPM URL: https://pagure.io/mobile-plasma-phonebook/blob/main/f/plasma-mobile-phonebook-21.12-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Convergent Plasma Mobile phonebook application Fedora Account System Username: thunderbirdtr
This package require first : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2041267
New version 22.06 added. Spec URL: https://pagure.io/mobile-plasma-phonebook/raw/main/f/plasma-mobile-phonebook.spec SRPM URL: https://pagure.io/mobile-plasma-phonebook/raw/main/f/plasma-mobile-phonebook-22.06-1.fc36.src.rpm
Looks good except for Licenses. It looks like they added a license when you updates, and your License: line only has one listed. Here is a spec file diff that will fix the license problem. --- plasma-mobile-phonebook.spec 2022-08-30 23:16:49.000000000 -0700 +++ plasma-mobile-phonebook.fixed.spec 2022-09-01 15:21:06.894854918 -0700 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Name: plasma-mobile-phonebook Version: 22.06 Release: 1%{?dist} -License: GPLv3 +License: CC0 and GPLv2 and GPLv3 and GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ Summary: Convergent Plasma Mobile phonebook application Url: https://invent.kde.org/plasma-mobile/%{_origname} Source0: https://download.kde.org/stable/plasma-mobile/%{version}/%{_origname}-%{version}.tar.xz @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ %files -f %{_origname}.lang %doc README.md -%license LICENSES/{GPL-2.0-only,GPL-3.0-only,GPL-3.0-or-later,LGPL-2.0-or-later,LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-GPL}.txt +%license LICENSES/{CC0-1.0.txt,GPL-2.0-only,GPL-3.0-only,GPL-3.0-or-later,LGPL-2.0-or-later,LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-GPL}.txt %{_kf5_bindir}/%{_origname} %{_kf5_datadir}/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/org.kde.phonebook.svg %{_kf5_datadir}/applications/org.kde.phonebook.desktop
I am going to pass this to get it moving. Please fix the license issue. I will be double checking to make sure the license issue is fixed correctly. Issues: ======= - License: line does not have all the licenses - %license is missing one license ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. MANUAL: .so files are not in ld path. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Note: Using prebuilt packages [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "*No copyright* Creative Commons CC0 1.0", "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version 2", "GNU Library General Public License, Version 2.0", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License, Version 3", "*No copyright* GNU Library General Public License, Version 2.0", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License, Version 2", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License". 50 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/quake/review/phonebook/review-plasma-mobile- phonebook/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps, /usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/kpeople, /usr/share/icons/hicolor, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable, /usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/kpeople/actions MANUAL: All these directories are owned by dependencies [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: The spec file handles locales properly. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. MANUAL: The missing build dependencies will be in Rawhide with next repo regeneration [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: Mock build failed See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_use_rpmlint [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Installation errors ------------------- INFO: mock.py version 3.1 starting (python version = 3.11.0, NVR = mock-3.1-1.fc37)... Start(bootstrap): init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish(bootstrap): init plugins Start: init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish: init plugins INFO: Signal handler active Start: run Start(bootstrap): chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled package manager cache Start(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata Finish(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata INFO: enabled HW Info plugin Mock Version: 3.1 INFO: Mock Version: 3.1 Finish(bootstrap): chroot init Start: chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled package manager cache Start: cleaning package manager metadata Finish: cleaning package manager metadata INFO: enabled HW Info plugin Mock Version: 3.1 INFO: Mock Version: 3.1 Finish: chroot init INFO: installing package(s): /builddir/plasma-mobile-phonebook-debugsource-22.06-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm /builddir/plasma-mobile-phonebook-22.06-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm /builddir/plasma-mobile-phonebook-debuginfo-22.06-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm ERROR: Command failed: # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 030c30d747a84fb68278b3fc56aa3341 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.roz1f97c:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin --setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007" --setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 38 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock install /builddir/plasma-mobile-phonebook-debugsource-22.06-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm /builddir/plasma-mobile-phonebook-22.06-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm /builddir/plasma-mobile-phonebook-debuginfo-22.06-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts Rpmlint ------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Unversioned so-files -------------------- plasma-mobile-phonebook: /usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/kpeople/actions/phonebook_kpeople_plugin.so Source checksums ---------------- https://download.kde.org/stable/plasma-mobile/22.06/plasma-phonebook-22.06.tar.xz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 1c7d1cec7d6a478c9735a6282428b950a87fc9018a9ae215ab8be4271dbd0902 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 1c7d1cec7d6a478c9735a6282428b950a87fc9018a9ae215ab8be4271dbd0902 Requires -------- plasma-mobile-phonebook (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): kf5-kcontacts kf5-kcoreaddons kf5-kirigami2 kpeoplevcard libKF5ConfigCore.so.5()(64bit) libKF5ConfigGui.so.5()(64bit) libKF5Contacts.so.5()(64bit) libKF5CoreAddons.so.5()(64bit) libKF5I18n.so.5()(64bit) libKF5People.so.5()(64bit) libKF5PeopleBackend.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.15)(64bit) libQt5Gui.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Gui.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Qml.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Qml.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Quick.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Quick.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Widgets.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Widgets.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) plasma-mobile-phonebook-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): plasma-mobile-phonebook-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- plasma-mobile-phonebook: application() application(org.kde.phonebook.desktop) metainfo() metainfo(org.kde.phonebook.metainfo.xml) plasma-mobile-phonebook plasma-mobile-phonebook(x86-64) plasma-mobile-phonebook-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) plasma-mobile-phonebook-debuginfo plasma-mobile-phonebook-debuginfo(x86-64) plasma-mobile-phonebook-debugsource: plasma-mobile-phonebook-debugsource plasma-mobile-phonebook-debugsource(x86-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -n plasma-mobile-phonebook -p Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Perl, Haskell, Java, SugarActivity, fonts, R, Ocaml, Python, PHP Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/plasma-phonebook
FEDORA-2022-7a3ac34a1f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-7a3ac34a1f
FEDORA-2022-268d81ab20 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-268d81ab20
FEDORA-2022-7a3ac34a1f has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-7a3ac34a1f \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-7a3ac34a1f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2022-268d81ab20 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-268d81ab20 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-268d81ab20 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2022-ba7ea6b8a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-ba7ea6b8a8` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ba7ea6b8a8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2022-6054582285 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-6054582285` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6054582285 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2022-ba7ea6b8a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2022-6054582285 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.