Could you please branch and build perl-Email-Abstract for EPEL 9 ?
Hi Spot, this one, along with perl-Mail-Transport, needs to be built in the middle of a bootstrap cycle for perl-Mail-Message. I am happy to do the builds of all three packages if you give me commit access to them. Emmanuel: perl-Mail-Message depends on perl-Text-Autoformat (Bug #2046233) so if you could work on that it will help things along. Cheers, Paul.
Paul, you should have admin rights on perl-Mail-Transport, perl-Mail-Message, and perl-Email-Abstract now. Email-Abstract has an epel9 branch, but until Mail-Message is done, it won't build.
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #2) > Paul, you should have admin rights on perl-Mail-Transport, > perl-Mail-Message, and perl-Email-Abstract now. Email-Abstract has an epel9 > branch, but until Mail-Message is done, it won't build. Thanks. perl-Mail-Transport and perl-Mail-Message look OK but I don't see me listed for perl-Email-Abstract yet. That won't matter for epel9 because it's already branched but it'd be nice to have for when epel10 comes around. I've done the branch requests for perl-Mail-Transport and perl-Mail-Message and should be able to handle all three packages once they're done.
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-93d3b108e8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-93d3b108e8
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-93d3b108e8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-93d3b108e8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #3) > (In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #2) > > Paul, you should have admin rights on perl-Mail-Transport, > > perl-Mail-Message, and perl-Email-Abstract now. Email-Abstract has an epel9 > > branch, but until Mail-Message is done, it won't build. > > Thanks. perl-Mail-Transport and perl-Mail-Message look OK but I don't see me > listed for perl-Email-Abstract yet. That won't matter for epel9 because it's > already branched but it'd be nice to have for when epel10 comes around. I've > done the branch requests for perl-Mail-Transport and perl-Mail-Message and > should be able to handle all three packages once they're done. Not sure how that broke, but it is fixed now.
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #6) > (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #3) > > Thanks. perl-Mail-Transport and perl-Mail-Message look OK but I don't see me > > listed for perl-Email-Abstract yet. That won't matter for epel9 because it's > > already branched but it'd be nice to have for when epel10 comes around. I've > > done the branch requests for perl-Mail-Transport and perl-Mail-Message and > > should be able to handle all three packages once they're done. > > Not sure how that broke, but it is fixed now. Thanks.
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-93d3b108e8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.