Spec URL: https://gitlab.com/lsm5/aardvark-dns/-/raw/main/aardvark-dns.spec SRPM URL: https://gitlab.com/lsm5/aardvark-dns/-/raw/main/SRPMS/aardvark-dns-0-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Authoritative DNS server for A/AAAA container records Fedora Account System Username: lsm5 Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81605289 rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 3 aardvark-dns.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/libexec/podman/aardvark-dns aardvark-dns.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains undefined macros: Release: %autorelease %autochangelog Version: 0 ? loads of useless commented out stuff: #%%cargo_prep #%%generate_buildrequires #%%cargo_generate_buildrequires I'd be more verbose than this: %global _description %{expand: %{summary}} This one misses build requires? ExclusiveArch: %{rust_arches} The package is obviously autogenerated, please amend it so it meets basic packaging standards.
Spec URL: https://gitlab.com/lsm5/aardvark-dns/-/raw/main/aardvark-dns.spec SRPM URL: https://gitlab.com/lsm5/aardvark-dns/-/raw/main/SRPMS/aardvark-dns-0-0.1.gitbab0ac1.fc35.src.rpm (In reply to Jindrich Novy from comment #1) > The package contains undefined macros: > > Release: %autorelease > %autochangelog See: https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/principle.html I removed %autorelease since we don't have a versioned release upstream yet. But let's keep %autochangelog. > > Version: 0 ? No upstream tag yet. > > loads of useless commented out stuff: > #%%cargo_prep > > #%%generate_buildrequires > #%%cargo_generate_buildrequires Removed. I'd kept it as a reminder to anyone looking that rust2rpm doesn't work because dependencies missing, but anyway. > > I'd be more verbose than this: > %global _description %{expand: > %{summary}} done. > > This one misses build requires? > ExclusiveArch: %{rust_arches} done.
ugh i might need to change rpmautospec-rpm-macros.
Spec URL: https://gitlab.com/lsm5/aardvark-dns/-/raw/main/aardvark-dns.spec SRPM URL: https://gitlab.com/lsm5/aardvark-dns/-/raw/main/SRPMS/aardvark-dns-0-0.1.gitbab0ac1.fc35.src.rpm
Does upstream plan to do an initial release? I don't quite feel comfortable with putting unreleased content in Fedora. I also see: Version: 0 But changelog says it is 0.2.2?
(In reply to Jindrich Novy from comment #5) > Does upstream plan to do an initial release? I don't quite feel comfortable > with putting unreleased content in Fedora. Upstream will be cutting an initial tag soon. This won't be going into Fedora 34 at all. RE: f35, I can wait until we have an upstream tag. But it would be nice to put it in rawhide soon as we can. netavark will need this and podman 4.0 should have netavark available. > > I also see: > Version: 0 Yes, because we don't have an upstream release yet. > > But changelog says it is 0.2.2? It said 0-0.2.gitBLAHBLAH. Now it should be 0-0.3.gitBLAHBLAH. Spec URL: https://gitlab.com/lsm5/aardvark-dns/-/raw/main/aardvark-dns.spec SRPM URL: https://gitlab.com/lsm5/aardvark-dns/-/raw/main/SRPMS/aardvark-dns-0-0.3.git43cd189.fc35.src.rpm
There are duplicated provides: Provides: bundled(crate(env_logger)) = v0.8.4 Provides: bundled(crate(env_logger)) = v0.9.0 This binary is unstripped: /usr/libexec/podman/aardvark-dns
(In reply to Jindrich Novy from comment #7) > There are duplicated provides: > > Provides: bundled(crate(env_logger)) = v0.8.4 > Provides: bundled(crate(env_logger)) = v0.9.0 Both versions are vendored upstream currently. I'll check with upstream about using only 1, but not sure how long that's gonna take. But I hope that's not a blocker. > This binary is unstripped: > > /usr/libexec/podman/aardvark-dns Package fails to build with debuginfo enabled. Hope that's not a blocker either.
Ok, fair enough.
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/aardvark-dns
FEDORA-2022-a1f597311f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a1f597311f
FEDORA-2022-a1f597311f has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2022-a1f597311f \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a1f597311f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2022-2a101a0345 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2022-2a101a0345` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-2a101a0345 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2022-5869f3225b has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2022-5869f3225b` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-5869f3225b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2022-bc2075bf86 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2022-bc2075bf86` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-bc2075bf86 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2022-bc2075bf86 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.