Bug 2047247 - Review Request: softnet-stat - Parse the `/proc/net/softnet_stat` file into something more readable
Summary: Review Request: softnet-stat - Parse the `/proc/net/softnet_stat` file into s...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jakub Kadlčík
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-01-27 13:05 UTC by Qiyu Yan
Modified: 2022-09-02 07:09 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-09-02 07:09:48 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:
jkadlcik: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Jakub Kadlčík 2022-08-26 21:45:10 UTC
Hello Qiyu,
the Copr project no longer exists so the sources and spec aren't
downloadable. Do you still want the package to be reviewed and added
to Fedora?

Comment 2 Qiyu Yan 2022-08-27 01:24:10 UTC
Yes, I updated links to srpm and spec file.

Comment 3 Jakub Kadlčík 2022-08-28 18:42:40 UTC
Thank you,
I tried the package and it works for me.

> %global _description %{expand:
> Parse the `/proc/net/softnet_stat` file into something more readable.}

It sucks that there is no text in the project README that we could
copy-paste here as a description. Can you please write 2-3 sentences
explaining the package a little bit, so we don't just duplicate the
summary?

Comment 4 Qiyu Yan 2022-08-30 15:36:33 UTC
I tried to start with a simple description, any further suggestion?

Comment 5 Jakub Kadlčík 2022-08-30 21:38:34 UTC
Thank you for the update. I think the package looks good now.



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or
     later". 9 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck
     in /home/jkadlcik/2047247-softnet-stat/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[?]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:


Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:



Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.2.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 3

softnet-stat-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/softnet-stat-2.0.0-1.fc38.x86_64.debug
softnet-stat.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary softnet-stat
softnet-stat-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation
softnet-stat-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-documentation
softnet-stat-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/softnet-stat-2.0.0-1.fc38.x86_64.debug /usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8)
ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/softnet-stat-2.0.0-1.fc38.x86_64.debug'

softnet-stat-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/ac/66df298bc2fd97f8143d9400d44e01db399735 ../../../.build-id/ac/66df298bc2fd97f8143d9400d44e01db399735
 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings, 1 badness; has taken 0.2 s



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/hjr3/softnet-stat/archive/refs/tags/v2.0.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 7a7f2725c0c2e7dfd87ac8b271de75166f8c56ca75198454740a866cd38b7121
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7a7f2725c0c2e7dfd87ac8b271de75166f8c56ca75198454740a866cd38b7121


Requires
--------
softnet-stat (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3)(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.2.0)(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

softnet-stat-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

softnet-stat-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
softnet-stat:
    softnet-stat
    softnet-stat(x86-64)

softnet-stat-debuginfo:
    debuginfo(build-id)
    softnet-stat-debuginfo
    softnet-stat-debuginfo(x86-64)

softnet-stat-debugsource:
    softnet-stat-debugsource
    softnet-stat-debugsource(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2047247
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: Perl, fonts, Java, Python, SugarActivity, R, Ocaml, C/C++, Haskell, PHP
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2022-09-01 15:01:41 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/softnet-stat

Comment 7 Qiyu Yan 2022-09-02 07:09:48 UTC
Package built in rawhide, closing. Thanks for your review.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.