Bug 2047773 - F36FailsToInstall: mlt-ruby
Summary: F36FailsToInstall: mlt-ruby
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: mlt
Version: 36
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Sergio Basto
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F36FailsToInstall RUBY3.1 F37FailsToInstall
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-01-28 14:08 UTC by Miro Hrončok
Modified: 2022-02-11 19:00 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: mlt-7.4.0-3.fc36
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-02-11 19:00:48 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Miro Hrončok 2022-01-28 14:08:07 UTC
Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok).

Your package (mlt) Fails To Install in Fedora 36:

can't install mlt-ruby:
  - nothing provides libruby.so.3.0()(64bit) needed by mlt-ruby-6.26.1-5.fc36.x86_64
  
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.


If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.

P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors.

P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages

Thanks!

Comment 1 Vít Ondruch 2022-01-28 15:47:41 UTC
The repository is in inconsistent state, the sources for 7.4 were not uploaded, while the .spec was modified. BTW the package also went unnoticed by mass rebuild.

Comment 2 Miro Hrončok 2022-01-28 16:39:56 UTC
> BTW the package also went unnoticed by mass rebuild.

The mass rebuild committed and attempted a rebuild but since the SRPM was not buildable, Koji does not associate the build with the package. See https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8601

Comment 3 Miro Hrončok 2022-02-07 09:03:17 UTC
Hello,

This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).

If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.

Comment 4 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 20:10:18 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 36 development cycle.
Changing version to 36.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2022-02-09 00:30:09 UTC
FEDORA-2022-ca5e302f39 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ca5e302f39

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-02-11 19:00:48 UTC
FEDORA-2022-ca5e302f39 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.