Bug 2048867 - Please branch and build fpc for epel9
Summary: Please branch and build fpc for epel9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: fpc
Version: epel9
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-02-01 03:04 UTC by Ian Laurie
Modified: 2022-08-25 16:33 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: fpc-3.2.2-9.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-08-25 16:33:02 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ian Laurie 2022-02-01 03:04:21 UTC
Please branch and build fpc for epel9.

Comment 1 Artur Frenszek-Iwicki 2022-02-20 16:40:56 UTC
I would need some help with this, since FPC 3.2.2 depends on tex(imakeidx.sty), which is not available in EPEL9 (nor on EPEL8, that's why it still has FPC 3.2.0).

Possible solutions:
1) Patch the docs to remove this dependency
2) Don't build the docs on EPEL9 at all
3) Use an older version FPC for now (3.2.0 did not have this dependency)

2) and 3) are pretty straightforward, but obviously 1) would be most preferable.
I have zero experience working with LaTeX, though, so as I wrote earlier, I'd need some help.

Comment 2 Ian Laurie 2022-02-25 22:32:34 UTC
Sadly I've not had any contact with LaTeX either.  Would an easier solution be to bring imakeidx.sty into EPEL9 or would that be an even bigger can of worms?

Comment 3 Artur Frenszek-Iwicki 2022-03-02 11:31:18 UTC
The main issue with bringing imakeidx.sty into EPEL9, as far as I see, is that in Fedora, the package is built from the texlive SRPM.
RHEL/CentOS ships its own texlive, but it doesn't contain all the packages Fedora's texlive has - and imakeidx.sty is one of the missing ones.
So if we wanted to bring that into EPEL, we'd possibly end up in a situation where we have both RHEL texlive and EPEL texlive, conflicting
with each other - or EPEL texlive would have to be built in some roundabout way, where the SRPM produces only the missing *.sty packages,
omitting anything already provided by RHEL texlive.

I'll drop an e-mail to texlive's maintainer, with a link to this bug, and ask them about their opinion.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2022-08-17 10:28:20 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1592a79294 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1592a79294

Comment 5 Artur Frenszek-Iwicki 2022-08-17 10:29:46 UTC
I ultimately decided to simply build the package without the docs, at least for the time being.
Sorry for taking so long with this.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-08-18 02:28:41 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1592a79294 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1592a79294

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-08-25 16:33:02 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1592a79294 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.