Bug 2049613
| Summary: | MTU migration on SDN IPv4 causes API alerts | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Jaime Caamaño Ruiz <jcaamano> |
| Component: | Networking | Assignee: | Patryk Diak <pdiak> |
| Networking sub component: | openshift-sdn | QA Contact: | zhaozhanqi <zzhao> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | Docs Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | ||
| Priority: | high | CC: | anusaxen, surya |
| Version: | 4.10 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 4.11.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | No Doc Update | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-08-10 10:46:22 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jaime Caamaño Ruiz
2022-02-02 13:10:28 UTC
qq: Is this really a bug? Isn't MTU migration something that comes with "expected disruption?". The alerts are a way of saying, "hey something important is happening", so for a few mins having alert is in firing state is not detrimental right - infact that tells the cluster-admin sdn pods are rolling-in? When the alert fades away we also know things are fine? (In reply to Surya Seetharaman from comment #1) > qq: Is this really a bug? Isn't MTU migration something that comes with > "expected disruption?". The alerts are a way of saying, "hey something > important is happening", so for a few mins having alert is in firing state > is not detrimental right - infact that tells the cluster-admin sdn pods are > rolling-in? When the alert fades away we also know things are fine? The alerts have a threshold that already account for temporary disruption. When they fire the disruption was higher than the threshold and more than expected. (In reply to Jaime Caamaño Ruiz from comment #2) > (In reply to Surya Seetharaman from comment #1) > > qq: Is this really a bug? Isn't MTU migration something that comes with > > "expected disruption?". The alerts are a way of saying, "hey something > > important is happening", so for a few mins having alert is in firing state > > is not detrimental right - infact that tells the cluster-admin sdn pods are > > rolling-in? When the alert fades away we also know things are fine? > > The alerts have a threshold that already account for temporary disruption. > When they fire the disruption was higher than the threshold and more than > expected. And just a note that this specific to API availability alerts. The MTU migration procedure reboots nodes in sequence with compatible MTU settings across nodes at all times with the intention of keeping the cluster operative during the procedure with minimal or nonexistent disruption. If we identify disruption for a reason that we can fix or improve upon, I guess it is all right to do it ;) Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Important: OpenShift Container Platform 4.11.0 bug fix and security update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:5069 The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 365 days |