Bug 2049716 - Review Request: aws-c-checksums - Checksum package for AWS SDK for C
Summary: Review Request: aws-c-checksums - Checksum package for AWS SDK for C
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2049379
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW 2049748
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-02-02 15:25 UTC by David Duncan
Modified: 2023-12-29 00:45 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-12-29 00:45:36 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description David Duncan 2022-02-02 15:25:58 UTC
Spec URL: https://davdunc.fedorapeople.org/awscli-2-rpms/aws-checksums.spec
SRPM URL: https://davdunc.fedorapeople.org/awscli-2-rpms/aws-checksums-0.1.12-2.fc35.src.rpm
Description: Cross-Platform HW accelerated CRC32c and CRC32 with fallback to efficient SW implementations. C interface with language bindings for each of the AWS SDKs
Fedora Account System Username: davdunc

Comment 1 Soumil 2022-11-28 18:18:45 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
- Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
  Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir.
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/#_devel_packages


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[ ]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0",
     "Apache License 2.0". 11 files have unknown license. Detailed output
     of licensecheck in /home/soumil/2049716-aws-checksums/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/aws-checksums,
     /usr/include/aws/checksums, /usr/lib64/aws-checksums/cmake/shared,
     /usr/lib64/aws-checksums/cmake
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/include/aws/checksums,
     /usr/include/aws, /usr/lib64/aws-checksums/cmake/shared,
     /usr/lib64/aws-checksums/cmake, /usr/lib64/aws-checksums
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in aws-
     checksums-libs , aws-checksums-devel
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[ ]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[ ]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: Mock build failed
     See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
     guidelines/#_use_rpmlint
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
     Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
     attached diff).
     See: (this test has no URL)
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.


Installation errors
-------------------
INFO: mock.py version 3.3 starting (python version = 3.10.8, NVR = mock-3.3-1.fc36)...
Start(bootstrap): init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish(bootstrap): init plugins
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
INFO: Signal handler active
Start: run
Start(bootstrap): chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled package manager cache
Start(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata
Finish(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Mock Version: 3.3
INFO: Mock Version: 3.3
Finish(bootstrap): chroot init
Start: chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled package manager cache
Start: cleaning package manager metadata
Finish: cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Mock Version: 3.3
INFO: Mock Version: 3.3
Finish: chroot init
INFO: installing package(s): /builddir/aws-checksums-libs-0.1.12-2.fc38.x86_64.rpm /builddir/aws-checksums-debugsource-0.1.12-2.fc38.x86_64.rpm /builddir/aws-checksums-libs-debuginfo-0.1.12-2.fc38.x86_64.rpm /builddir/aws-checksums-devel-0.1.12-2.fc38.x86_64.rpm
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 4ff599a50ee54ac68fc2261cd5cdbbd7 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.5r9fpo8z:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin --setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007" --setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$  --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 38 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock install /builddir/aws-checksums-libs-0.1.12-2.fc38.x86_64.rpm /builddir/aws-checksums-debugsource-0.1.12-2.fc38.x86_64.rpm /builddir/aws-checksums-libs-debuginfo-0.1.12-2.fc38.x86_64.rpm /builddir/aws-checksums-devel-0.1.12-2.fc38.x86_64.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts



Rpmlint
-------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:


Unversioned so-files
--------------------
aws-checksums-libs: /usr/lib64/libaws-checksums.so

Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/awslabs/aws-checksums/archive/v0.1.12/aws-checksums-0.1.12.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 394723034b81cc7cd528401775bc7aca2b12c7471c92350c80a0e2fb9d2909fe
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 394723034b81cc7cd528401775bc7aca2b12c7471c92350c80a0e2fb9d2909fe


Requires
--------
aws-checksums-libs (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    aws-checksums(x86-64)
    libaws-c-common.so.1()(64bit)
    libaws-checksums.so.1.0.0()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

aws-checksums-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    aws-checksums-libs(x86-64)

aws-checksums-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
aws-checksums-libs:
    aws-checksums-libs
    aws-checksums-libs(x86-64)
    libaws-checksums.so.1.0.0()(64bit)

aws-checksums-devel:
    aws-checksums-devel
    aws-checksums-devel(x86-64)

aws-checksums-debugsource:
    aws-checksums-debugsource
    aws-checksums-debugsource(x86-64)



Diff spec file in url and in SRPM
---------------------------------
--- /home/soumil/2049716-aws-checksums/srpm/aws-checksums.spec	2022-11-28 13:06:50.169480600 -0500
+++ /home/soumil/2049716-aws-checksums/srpm-unpacked/aws-checksums.spec	2022-02-03 09:50:04.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:           aws-checksums
 Version:        0.1.12 
-Release:        5%{?dist}
+Release:        2%{?dist}
 Summary:        Checksum package for AWS SDK for C
 
@@ -7,5 +7,4 @@
 URL:            https://github.com/awslabs/%{name}
 Source0:        %{url}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
-Patch0:         aws-checksums-cmake.patch
 
 BuildRequires:  gcc
@@ -23,5 +22,6 @@
 %package libs
 Summary:        Checksum package for AWS SDK for C
-
+Requires:       %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
+	
 %description libs
 Checksum package for AWS SDK for C. Contains
@@ -41,5 +41,5 @@
 
 %prep
-%autosetup -p1
+%autosetup
 
 
@@ -52,31 +52,21 @@
 
 
-%files libs
+%files
 %license LICENSE
 %doc README.md
+
+%files libs
+%{_libdir}/libaws-checksums.so
 %{_libdir}/libaws-checksums.so.1.0.0
 
 %files devel
-%dir %{_includedir}/aws/checksums
 %{_includedir}/aws/checksums/*.h
 
-%dir %{_libdir}/cmake/aws-checksums
-%dir %{_libdir}/cmake/aws-checksums/shared
-%{_libdir}/libaws-checksums.so
-%{_libdir}/cmake/aws-checksums/aws-checksums-config.cmake
-%{_libdir}/cmake/aws-checksums/shared/aws-checksums-targets-noconfig.cmake
-%{_libdir}/cmake/aws-checksums/shared/aws-checksums-targets.cmake
+%{_libdir}/aws-checksums/cmake/aws-checksums-config.cmake
+%{_libdir}/aws-checksums/cmake/shared/aws-checksums-targets-noconfig.cmake
+%{_libdir}/aws-checksums/cmake/shared/aws-checksums-targets.cmake
 
 
 %changelog
-* Tue Feb 22 2022 David Duncan <davdunc> - 0.1.12-5
-- Updated for package review
-
-* Tue Feb 22 2022 Kyle Knapp <kyleknap> - 0.1.12-4
-- Include missing devel directories
-
-* Thu Feb 03 2022 Kyle Knapp <kyleknap> - 0.1.12-3
-- Update specfile based on review feedback
-
 * Wed Feb 02 2022 David Duncan <davdunc> - 0.1.12-2
 - Prepare for package review


Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2049716
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: C/C++, Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: Haskell, Ocaml, PHP, SugarActivity, R, Python, Perl, Java, fonts
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Comment 2 Package Review 2023-11-29 00:45:26 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 3 Package Review 2023-12-29 00:45:36 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.