Bug 205000 - ethtool needs to be updated to release 4 or 5 for latest intel e1000 drivers
Summary: ethtool needs to be updated to release 4 or 5 for latest intel e1000 drivers
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: ethtool
Version: 6
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jeff Garzik
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-09-01 23:43 UTC by Greg Morgan
Modified: 2013-07-03 02:29 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-07-21 23:02:44 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Greg Morgan 2006-09-01 23:43:27 UTC
Description of problem:
Please see bug 200656.
ethtool -e eth0 produces
"Cannot get driver information: Operation not supported"
Intel is using a script with ethtool to track down eeprom issues.
2.6.17-1.2157 kernel with Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version
7.0.33-k2-NAPI e1000 driver fail with ethtool 3.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ethtool-3-1.2.1

How reproducible:
Use latest FC5 kernel and an e1000 driver.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. ethtool -e eth0
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Cannot get driver information: Operation not supported

Expected results:
ethtool -e eth0
Offset          Values
------          ------
...

Additional info:
FC 6 also needs version 4 or 5.

Comment 1 Matthew Miller 2007-04-06 16:15:55 UTC
Fedora Core 5 and Fedora Core 6 are, as we're sure you've noticed, no longer
test releases. We're cleaning up the bug database and making sure important bug
reports filed against these test releases don't get lost. It would be helpful if
you could test this issue with a released version of Fedora or with the latest
development / test release. Thanks for your help and for your patience.

[This is a bulk message for all open FC5/FC6 test release bugs. I'm adding
myself to the CC list for each bug, so I'll see any comments you make after this
and do my best to make sure every issue gets proper attention.]


Comment 2 Greg Morgan 2007-07-21 23:02:44 UTC
This has been fixed in Fedora 7.  I skipped 6 so I don't know that it was fixed
in Fedora 6.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.