RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2054906 - Backport package section argument validation fixes
Summary: Backport package section argument validation fixes
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: pykickstart
Version: 9.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Brian Lane
QA Contact: Release Test Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-02-16 00:12 UTC by Brian Lane
Modified: 2022-05-17 14:13 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: pykickstart-3.32.4-1.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-17 14:13:27 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
pm-rhel: mirror+

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-112429 0 None None None 2022-02-16 00:16:42 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RTT-4248 0 None None None 2022-02-16 10:44:36 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RTT-4249 0 None None None 2022-02-16 10:44:41 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2022:2674 0 None None None 2022-05-17 14:13:31 UTC

Description Brian Lane 2022-02-16 00:12:06 UTC 
https://github.com/pykickstart/pykickstart/issues/395 reported that ksvalidator was returning incorrect results for the `%package` section arguments that have have all lower case options added.

This has been fixed upstream and needs to be backported for 9.0

User's report was:

I have a two kickstarts, one for RHEL8 and another for RHEL9 that only differ in one detail:

    rhel8.ks:%packages --excludedocs --nocore --instLangs=en
    rhel9.ks:%packages --excludedocs --nocore --inst-langs=en

On pykickstart-3.16.14-1.el8, ksvalidator works as would be expected. ksvalidator -v RHEL8 rhel8.ks validates successfully and ksvalidator -v RHEL8 rhel9.ks fails with this error:

The following problem occurred on line 16 of the kickstart file:

unrecognized arguments: --inst-langs=en

However, on pykickstart-3.32.2-2.el9, it seems that the arguments are ignored completely:

    ksvalidator -v RHEL8 rhel8.ks: passes, OK
    ksvalidator -v RHEL8 rhel9.ks: passes, should fail
    ksvalidator -v RHEL9 rhel8.ks: passes, should fail (instLangs is deprecated)
    ksvalidator -v RHEL9 rhel9.ks: passes, OK

I replicated the same behavior with the latest release, from this repo pykickstart-3.34.
Comment 2 Jan Stodola 2022-02-22 12:18:16 UTC 
pykickstart-3.32.4-1.el9 looks good:

[root@localhost ~]# cat rhel8.ks 
%packages --instLangs=en --excludeWeakdeps
%end
[root@localhost ~]# cat rhel9.ks 
%packages --inst-langs=en --exclude-weakdeps
%end
[root@localhost ~]#


Reproduction with old pykickstart:

[root@localhost ~]# rpm -q pykickstart
pykickstart-3.32.2-2.el9.noarch
[root@localhost ~]# ksvalidator -v RHEL8 rhel8.ks && echo PASS || echo FAIL
PASS
[root@localhost ~]# ksvalidator -v RHEL8 rhel9.ks && echo PASS || echo FAIL
PASS
[root@localhost ~]# ksvalidator -v RHEL9 rhel8.ks && echo PASS || echo FAIL
The --excludeWeakdeps option on line 1 will be deprecated in future releases. Please modify your kickstart file to replace this option with its preferred alias --exclude-weakdeps.
FAIL
[root@localhost ~]# ksvalidator -v RHEL9 rhel9.ks && echo PASS || echo FAIL
PASS
[root@localhost ~]#


With pykickstart-3.32.4-1.el9 the behavior is correct:

[root@localhost ~]# rpm -q pykickstart
pykickstart-3.32.4-1.el9.noarch
[root@localhost ~]# ksvalidator -v RHEL8 rhel8.ks && echo PASS || echo FAIL
PASS
[root@localhost ~]# ksvalidator -v RHEL8 rhel9.ks && echo PASS || echo FAIL
The following problem occurred on line 1 of the kickstart file:

unrecognized arguments: --inst-langs=en --exclude-weakdeps

FAIL
[root@localhost ~]# ksvalidator -v RHEL9 rhel8.ks && echo PASS || echo FAIL
The --instLangs option on line 1 will be deprecated in future releases. Please modify your kickstart file to replace this option with its preferred alias --inst-langs.
FAIL
[root@localhost ~]# ksvalidator -v RHEL9 rhel9.ks && echo PASS || echo FAIL
PASS
[root@localhost ~]#
Comment 3 Jan Stodola 2022-02-23 17:17:22 UTC 
Verified:Tested based on comment 2.
Comment 6 Jan Stodola 2022-02-25 16:18:37 UTC 
pykickstart-3.32.4-1.el9 is included in RHEL-9.0.0-20220225.1.

Moving to VERIFIED.
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-17 14:13:27 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (new packages: pykickstart), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:2674
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.