Description of problem: As found in OpenQA [0][1], /etc/os-release VERSION and PRETTY_NAME do not include the date after "36". [0] https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1129446#step/os_release/32 [1] https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1132002#step/os_release/32 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora-IoT-36-20220214.0 Fedora-IoT-36-20220216.0 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install Fedora-IoT-36-20220214.0 or Fedora-IoT-36-20220216.0, any arch. 2. 'cat /etc/os-release' 3. View VERSION and PRETTY_NAME
Proposed as a Blocker for 36-final by Fedora user coremodule using the blocker tracking app because: Proposing as a potential violation of the following F36 Final criterion [0]: "For each Edition... the relevant fields in /etc/os-release must include the correct Edition name." [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Final_Release_Criteria#Self-identification
Yeah, I wasn't actually sure whether this was an intentional change or not, but I forgot to file it - thanks for doing so, Geoff.
The decision to classify this bug as a "RejectedBlocker (Final)" was made based off votes here: [0] https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/615
Moving to fedora-iot, I think it's the treefile at https://pagure.io/fedora-iot/ostree/blob/f36/f/fedora-iot-base.json which has not been updated for F36.
So I think this should be fixed with 36.20220223.0 when it's finished shortly can you verify.
Looks good to me, checked on 20220302.0 and looks as it should. Thanks pbrobinson.