Bug 2056655 - Please branch and build gRPC in EPEL 7/8/9
Summary: Please branch and build gRPC in EPEL 7/8/9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 2053630
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: grpc
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ben Beasley
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-02-21 18:21 UTC by Enrique
Modified: 2022-02-21 21:01 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-02-21 18:58:48 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Enrique 2022-02-21 18:21:27 UTC
Please branch and build gRPC in epel7/8/9.

It would be great if gRPC, with at least c++ and python language bindings. I can help with testing and potential troubleshooting.

Comment 1 Ben Beasley 2022-02-21 18:58:48 UTC
Dependencies are an issue here for older distributions. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757147 for EPEL8, which I resolved as WONTFIX after quite a bit of investigation.

EPEL9 is planned, and you can track progress at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053630. Currently, much of the dependency tree is complete, but there are quite a few Python packages that still need to be branched; the abseil-cpp update in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/abseil-cpp/pull-request/1 needs to be completed in Rawhide and branched to EPEL9; and I need to evaluate whether the abseil-cpp update allows me to get grpc up to date in Rawhide—currently blocked by undiagnosed segfaults in the tests related to absl::string_view.

I’ll post status updates in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053630 and in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2024386. I’m happy to have your help with any issues that come up.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2053630 ***

Comment 2 Enrique 2022-02-21 21:01:07 UTC
Hi,

thank you very much for your prompt comment. I see you had an extensive work trying to make it work for EPEL 8. Our systems are currently using EPEL 7 and would migrate to EPEL 8 soon, but I am afraid EPEL 9 is still far in the future. I will nevertheless check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053630 once a package is ready.

Thank you!


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.