Bug 2056663 - Review Request: golang-github-mroach-rom64 - Nintendo 64 ROM utility
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-mroach-rom64 - Nintendo 64 ROM utility
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mikel Olasagasti Uranga
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-02-21 18:48 UTC by Davide Cavalca
Modified: 2022-07-14 01:57 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-07-05 15:32:41 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
mikel: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Davide Cavalca 2022-02-21 18:48:26 UTC
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-github-mroach-rom64/golang-github-mroach-rom64.spec
SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-github-mroach-rom64/golang-github-mroach-rom64-0.5.0-1.fc37.src.rpm

Description:

Nintendo 64 ROM utility written in Go:
- List information about all ROMs in a directory
- Show information about a single ROM
- Convert a ROM file to the native (Z64, Big-endian) format
- Validate the ROM's SHA-1 checksum against a list of known-good ROM dumps.

Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca

Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2022-02-21 18:48:29 UTC
This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=83135872

Comment 2 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2022-03-16 11:10:22 UTC
Hi Davide,

The spec is correct. I've two comments:

- Package could be named rom64 rather than golang-github-mroach-rom64. If you want to do so, rename the BZ, the spec and define goname as done for example in `doctl` package.

- Package has no tests, so %check section could be removed, but I think it's better to keep it in case future releases have any test.

Let me know if you decide to change the name or not and will approve later.

Comment 3 Davide Cavalca 2022-03-17 06:15:20 UTC
Thanks! I prefer to keep the source package named golang-github-mroach-rom64 to make this easier to update in the future with go2rpm; the binary package is named rom64 already. Likewise for the check section.

Comment 4 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2022-03-17 10:29:01 UTC
Understood Davide.

go2rpm package, fedora-review is correct:

- The specfile is sane
- License is correct
- Builds successfully in mock
- No rpmlint errors
- %check section passes (no tests available currently)
- The latest version is packaged
- The package complies with the Packaging Guidelines

Package approved! On import, don't forget to do the following:

- Add package to release-monitoring.org
- Add package to Koschei.
- Give go-sig privileges on package
- Close the review bug by referencing it in the rpm changelog and/or the Bodhi ticket.

Comment 5 Davide Cavalca 2022-03-17 16:26:36 UTC
Thanks!

$ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-mroach-rom64 2056663
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/43057

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2022-03-17 20:56:35 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-mroach-rom64

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-07-05 04:09:25 UTC
FEDORA-2022-e29ed2ce37 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-e29ed2ce37

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-07-05 15:32:41 UTC
FEDORA-2022-e29ed2ce37 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2022-07-05 19:59:24 UTC
FEDORA-2022-d65b4fc232 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d65b4fc232

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2022-07-05 20:09:04 UTC
FEDORA-2022-48ce7d2489 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-48ce7d2489

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2022-07-06 01:24:30 UTC
FEDORA-2022-48ce7d2489 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-48ce7d2489 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-48ce7d2489

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2022-07-06 02:16:17 UTC
FEDORA-2022-d65b4fc232 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-d65b4fc232 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d65b4fc232

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2022-07-14 01:46:00 UTC
FEDORA-2022-d65b4fc232 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2022-07-14 01:57:01 UTC
FEDORA-2022-48ce7d2489 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.