RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 2057150 - GNOME Shell Background Logo extension doesn't show any logo
Summary: GNOME Shell Background Logo extension doesn't show any logo
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gnome-shell-extension-background-logo
Version: 9.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Florian Müllner
QA Contact: Tomas Pelka
Marek Suchánek
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2052594
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-02-22 19:31 UTC by Tomas Pelka
Modified: 2022-05-17 14:12 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: gnome-shell-40.9-2.el9 gnome-shell-extension-background-logo-40.0~rc-4.el9
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.The default wallpaper adds a Red Hat logo The default RHEL wallpaper now displays a Red Hat logo. The logo is located in the upper left corner of the screen. To disable the logo, disable the *Background Logo* GNOME Shell extension.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-17 14:12:08 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
pm-rhel: mirror+

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-113114 0 None None None 2022-02-22 19:38:25 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2022:2668 0 None None None 2022-05-17 14:12:13 UTC

Description Tomas Pelka 2022-02-22 19:31:39 UTC 
Description of problem:
Hey Florian do you think it would make sense to set some default logo, perhaps recomand redhat-logos too?

Also in order to be consistent shouldn't we make the extension installed from rpm enabled by default?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnome-shell-extension-background-logo-40.0~rc-2.el9.noarch

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 2 Florian Müllner 2022-02-22 19:46:44 UTC 
(In reply to Tomas Pelka from comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> Hey Florian do you think it would make sense to set some default logo,
> perhaps recomand redhat-logos too?

The way it works in Fedora is that the branding team tells me the settings values it want to use, and I use those values for the settings defaults.

I think the same makes sense here, because while I've seen some mockups for the RHEL wallpaper, branding is in a better position to pick the right file/size/border.


> Also in order to be consistent shouldn't we make the extension installed
> from rpm enabled by default?

I think so, yes.
Comment 3 Tomas Popela 2022-02-24 08:45:53 UTC 
> Also in order to be consistent shouldn't we make the extension installed from rpm enabled by default?

Yes, it needs to be enabled, but I will add that the composes were adjusted and this extension will be installed together with GNOME group.

(In reply to Florian Müllner from comment #2)
> (In reply to Tomas Pelka from comment #0)
> > Description of problem:
> > Hey Florian do you think it would make sense to set some default logo,
> > perhaps recomand redhat-logos too?
> 
> The way it works in Fedora is that the branding team tells me the settings
> values it want to use, and I use those values for the settings defaults.
> 
> I think the same makes sense here, because while I've seen some mockups for
> the RHEL wallpaper, branding is in a better position to pick the right
> file/size/border.

@aday @rstrode
Comment 4 Allan Day 2022-02-24 15:50:42 UTC 
I've experimented with how to present the logo today. So far the best I can come up with is:

 * Use fedora_logo_darkbackground.svg for the logo
 * Offset it from the top left corner by 5% of the display width
 * Set its width to 16% of the display width (maintaining its aspect ratio)

This works pretty well at standard aspect ratios. Where it doesn't work so well is non-standard aspect ratios, like ultrawide and portrait. For that we might need to explore specifying the position and size according to the screen area.
Comment 5 Florian Müllner 2022-02-28 12:35:37 UTC 
(In reply to Allan Day from comment #4)
> I've experimented with how to present the logo today. So far the best I can
> come up with is:
> 
>  * Use fedora_logo_darkbackground.svg for the logo

What's the full path?


>  * Offset it from the top left corner by 5% of the display width

The current setting is in pixels. If we want a screen-relative value, then that needs development and testing we don't have time for.


>  * Set its width to 16% of the display width (maintaining its aspect ratio)

Current maximum is 15, is that ok as well? Or should I bump the maximum to - say - 20 and use 16 as default?
Comment 6 Tomas Popela 2022-02-28 12:40:57 UTC 
(In reply to Florian Müllner from comment #5)
> (In reply to Allan Day from comment #4)
> > I've experimented with how to present the logo today. So far the best I can
> > come up with is:
> > 
> >  * Use fedora_logo_darkbackground.svg for the logo
> 
> What's the full path?

/usr/share/redhat-logos/fedora_logo_darkbackground.svg and it's shipped in redhat-logos package
Comment 7 Florian Müllner 2022-02-28 12:52:12 UTC 
(In reply to Tomas Popela from comment #6)
> it's shipped in redhat-logos package

Do I need to add a "Requires"?
Comment 8 Florian Müllner 2022-02-28 13:00:36 UTC 
I opened https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/gnome-shell-extension-background-logo/-/merge_requests/4 with what we have so far.
Comment 9 Tomas Popela 2022-02-28 13:47:19 UTC 
(In reply to Florian Müllner from comment #7)
> (In reply to Tomas Popela from comment #6)
> > it's shipped in redhat-logos package
> 
> Do I need to add a "Requires"?

Looking at it closely you should actually require the system-logos so whatever we do works on CentOS Stream as well (through their centos-logos package that provides the system-logos as well).
Comment 10 Florian Müllner 2022-02-28 13:54:26 UTC 
(In reply to Tomas Popela from comment #9)
> Looking at it closely you should actually require the system-logos so
> whatever we do works on CentOS Stream as well (through their centos-logos
> package that provides the system-logos as well).

Done, although unless the logo path matches the rhel one, it won't work on centos.
Comment 11 Tomas Popela 2022-02-28 13:59:59 UTC 
(In reply to Florian Müllner from comment #10)
> (In reply to Tomas Popela from comment #9)
> > Looking at it closely you should actually require the system-logos so
> > whatever we do works on CentOS Stream as well (through their centos-logos
> > package that provides the system-logos as well).
> 
> Done, although unless the logo path matches the rhel one, it won't work on
> centos.

It does, so it should work.
Comment 21 Marek Suchánek 2022-04-28 15:31:24 UTC 
Hi Florian,
I've prepared a release note for this change. See the Doc Text field.

Since the logo only appears on the default wallpaper, I was at first hesitant whether to even include this in the release notes, because from the user perspective it's effectively just a change in the wallpaper style. However, the fact that you can disable or re-enable the logo is probably something that's worth documenting, so I've added that information.

Do we recommend any particular way to disable an extension, such as the Extensions application, or uninstalling the RPM package?
Comment 22 Florian Müllner 2022-05-04 13:03:23 UTC 
(In reply to Marek Suchánek from comment #21)

> Do we recommend any particular way to disable an extension, such as the
> Extensions application, or uninstalling the RPM package?

Not as far as I'm aware. Either the app, `gnome-extensions disable ...`, a dconf preset for `disabled-extensions` in `/org/gnome/shell` or uninstalling the package is fine and supported.
Comment 23 Marek Suchánek 2022-05-05 19:20:11 UTC 
Okay, then it's probably fine to leave it general as is. Thanks, Florian!
Comment 25 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-17 14:12:08 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (new packages: gnome-shell-extension-background-logo), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:2668
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.