@ahadas , @michal.skrivanek I would avoid to add more packages to RHV-H channel and rather suggest to use RHEL instead. But... this package is just 500kb and doesn't introduce any additional dependencies. I would consider to include it whithin RHV-H image itself. Any thought on this especially form the storage team point of view?
if there are no extra deps then let's just include it. "Requires: nvme-cli" in ovirt-host would do the job, no?
(In reply to Michal Skrivanek from comment #2) > if there are no extra deps then let's just include it. "Requires: nvme-cli" > in ovirt-host would do the job, no? Yep.
(In reply to Michal Skrivanek from comment #2) > if there are no extra deps then let's just include it. +1
Test version: RHVH-4.5-20220315.0-RHVH-x86_64-dvd1.iso # imgbase w You are on rhvh-4.5.0.2-0.20220315.0+1 # rpm -qa| grep nvme-cli nvme-cli-1.16-3.el8.x86_64 # rpm -qa| grep ovirt-host ovirt-host-4.5.0-1.el8ev.x86_64 RHVH includes the correct nvme-cli version, so the bug is fixed, change bug status to VERIFIED.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Low: RHV RHEL Host (ovirt-host) [ovirt-4.5.0] security update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:4764