Description of problem: Please apply this patch to qjackctl. It adds freebob driver support for firewire audio devices (tested with my presonus firebox). I'll also be submitting libfreebob to extras now, as well as a jack-audio-connection-kit spec file patch. I don't think it hurts to add this qjackctl patch in the meanwhile. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Try to select freebob driver 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
Created attachment 135914 [details] Patch to add to SRPM
(In reply to comment #0) > Description of problem: > Please apply this patch to qjackctl. It adds freebob driver support for > firewire audio devices (tested with my presonus firebox). > I'll also be submitting libfreebob to extras now, as well as a > jack-audio-connection-kit spec file patch. Interesting, I have already (unreleased) versions of cvs jack and libfreebob (which needs newer versions of some libs than were available in fc5). I'll send you what I currently have. > I don't think it hurts to add this > qjackctl patch in the meanwhile. Sure, should not be a problem. Wouldn't it be better to just package qjackctl cvs?
(In reply to comment #2) > Interesting, I have already (unreleased) versions of cvs jack and libfreebob > (which needs newer versions of some libs than were available in fc5). I'll send > you what I currently have. Ok. > > I don't think it hurts to add this > > qjackctl patch in the meanwhile. > > Sure, should not be a problem. > Wouldn't it be better to just package qjackctl cvs? I don't know.. your call.
This bug was fixed for FC6 some time ago and should be closed. Patched qjackctl is in FE6 for some time already. Will it be included in FC5 at some point? BTW, version 0.2.21 with FreeBoB support is out, that would obsolete need for patching.
(In reply to comment #4) > This bug was fixed for FC6 some time ago and should be closed. Patched qjackctl > is in FE6 for some time already. Will it be included in FC5 at some point? > > BTW, version 0.2.21 with FreeBoB support is out, that would obsolete need for > patching. Yes, I noticed the new version, regretfully I'm away on vacation so this will have to wait till I come back...
(In reply to comment #5) > Yes, I noticed the new version, regretfully I'm away on vacation so this will > have to wait till I come back... No problem. I'm still waiting for somebody to review libfreebob. AG
This was fixed some time ago. I'm going to close it.