Bug 2059772 - Please branch and build google-roboto-slab-fonts in epel8 and epel9
Summary: Please branch and build google-roboto-slab-fonts in epel8 and epel9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: google-roboto-slab-fonts
Version: epel9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Parag Nemade
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: EPELPackagersSIG
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-03-01 23:13 UTC by Davide Cavalca
Modified: 2022-03-02 15:49 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-03-02 15:49:17 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Davide Cavalca 2022-03-01 23:13:51 UTC
Please branch and build google-roboto-slab-fonts in epel8 and epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain google-roboto-slab-fonts in epel8 and epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/google-roboto-slab-fonts/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

Comment 1 Parag Nemade 2022-03-02 07:57:24 UTC
I don't understand why you think this package is not available in RHEL8 and RHEL9?

I see this https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/google-roboto-slab-fonts

another proof, if I still tries to request epel branch then I get this message
~/fedgit/google-roboto-slab-fonts$ fedpkg request-branch epel9
Could not execute request_branch: This package is already an EL package, therefore it cannot be in EPEL. If this is a mistake or you have an exception, please contact the Release Engineering team.

Comment 2 Davide Cavalca 2022-03-02 15:49:17 UTC
Oh you're totally right, looks like this is shipped in PowerTools for C8 and AppStream for C9. Sorry for the noise.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.