Bug 2060487 - [ODF to ODF MS] Consumer lost connection to provider API if the endpoint node is powered off/replaced
Summary: [ODF to ODF MS] Consumer lost connection to provider API if the endpoint node...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: ocs-operator
Version: 4.10
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ODF 4.11.0
Assignee: Nitin Goyal
QA Contact: Jilju Joy
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2096152
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-03-03 15:37 UTC by Neha Berry
Modified: 2023-08-09 17:00 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 4.11.0-96
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 2096152 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-08-24 13:49:08 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github red-hat-storage ocs-operator pull 1703 0 None open odf to odf: start using LoadBalancer type for ocs-provider-server svc 2022-06-06 10:22:18 UTC
Github red-hat-storage ocs-operator pull 1707 0 None open Bug 2060487:[release-4.11] odf to odf: start using LoadBalancer type for ocs-provider-server svc 2022-06-11 05:34:15 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2022:6156 0 None None None 2022-08-24 13:49:35 UTC

Comment 14 Mudit Agarwal 2022-03-14 14:43:50 UTC 
As discussed offline, moving it out of 4.10
Comment 17 Mudit Agarwal 2022-05-31 09:24:03 UTC 
Ohad/Nitin, what is the plan for this BZ?
Are we targeting this for 4.11?
Comment 21 Nitin Goyal 2022-06-06 10:22:49 UTC 
The PR is raised
Comment 24 Mudit Agarwal 2022-06-19 02:21:11 UTC 
Answered in the Jira story.
Comment 29 Nitin Goyal 2022-07-18 04:47:10 UTC 
Hello Jilju, 

The issue you are talking about should be treated separately and not with this bug. Please file a new bug for that in the MS.
Comment 30 Jilju Joy 2022-07-20 10:39:42 UTC 
(In reply to Nitin Goyal from comment #29)
> Hello Jilju, 
> 
> The issue you are talking about should be treated separately and not with
> this bug. Please file a new bug for that in the MS.

Moving this bug to verified state (test details added in the comment #28). A new bug will be created if the issue mentioned in the comment #28 is reproducible.
Comment 34 errata-xmlrpc 2022-08-24 13:49:08 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.11.0 security, enhancement, & bugfix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:6156
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.