Bug 206078 – java-1.4.2-gcj-compat seems to break azureus

Bug 206078 - java-1.4.2-gcj-compat seems to break azureus

Summary:	java-1.4.2-gcj-compat seems to break azureus

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 187103

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	azureus (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	5
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Anthony Green
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2006-09-11 16:14 EDT by Robert Scheck
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-09-11 22:11:50 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Robert Scheck 2006-09-11 16:14:43 EDT

Description of problem:
Installation of azureus works well and using it directly after the installation, 
too. But when using azureus for a while, the downloads and uploads break down 
completely (interrupting). Once this happend, there are only rarely traffic 
actitvities and with very less bandwidth, which makes azureus nearly unusable.

A workaround is to replace java-1.4.2-gcj-compat.i386 by the original Java from 
www.sun.com, but this can't be a fine solution for Fedora Extras, can it?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
azureus-2.4.0.3-0.20060604cvs_1.fc5.i386
java-1.4.2-gcj-compat.i386

How reproducible:
See above.

Actual results:
java-1.4.2-gcj-compat seems to break azureus

Expected results:
Azureus and java-1.4.2-gcj-compat without any breakdowns and problems.

Comment 1 Anthony Green 2006-09-11 22:11:50 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 187103 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.